[Restriction Campaign of Illegal Program Usage in Silkroad]

Extrme_G · **Joined:** Oct 2007 **Posts:** 748 **Location:**

Hello. This is Silkroad Online.

This is our new policy to protect our game from illegal program.

1. Silkroad Online scheduled to enforce strongly on an illegal program usage as such as auto hunting program called ‘BOT’.
(Brand new BOT detecting system would be applied)

2. Illegal program usage will not grant you to access the Silkroad Online.
(When you can’t login, simply reinstall the game to play it normally.)

3. When continuously illegal program usage is detected, the account would be restricted.

As the result, only normal client should be used. Any programs which might be considered as illegal programs should not be used.

HAHAHAH JOYMAX AGAIN

DDDD

Approximately 1,700 bots have been banned.

-.- · **Posted:** Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:10 am

(Brand new BOT detecting system would be applied)
.... would be... not will be? yeah I would be a rich if Joymax gave me their profits...

heh if you cant play, reinstall game... not much of a problem is it?

account restricted? not even banned anymore...

Karras · **Joined:** Nov 2008 **Posts:** 659 **Location:**

I remember the last time they really ban bots.
End of day, they unban almost all of them.

Epic245 · **Joined:** Jun 2009 **Posts:** 164 **Location:**

My friend just told me that

2. Illegal program usage will not grant you to access the Silkroad Online.
(When you can’t login, simply reinstall the game to play it normally.)

is completely false.

Drew_Benton · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 639 **Location:** Texas

I for one certainly hope they actually make the effort to fulfill this unlike their last "campaign"s which did nothing. If this is the case, we should see an actual implementation on the next client patch (I would assume Legend 4+'s client) and server sided related issues might already be placed into effect as of tonight (although I doubt that as it probably would take a bit more time to roll out on all the servers).

Unless they are only targeting clientless programs and in which case they may already have extra logic in the client that just has to be activated through a packet change. Wishful thinking on my part, but it might be possible. If that is the case, then no client patch is needed and most detection logic is going to be on the server, as it should be.

I guess we will have to just wait and see if anything changes over the next month. I'm not holding my breath, but even if they managed to ban all the gold spammers in town, that would certainly be a good start.

SwordCloud · **Posted:** Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:33 am

I really want to see if botter will be blocked(and maybe multi client user ).

Epic245 · **Joined:** Jun 2009 **Posts:** 164 **Location:**

I searched Drew_Benton in google and this came up...

<<If you ever post a link to a bot forum again prepare to meet my ban hammer>> - Barotix

First sentence plawks?

and

<<If you ever post a link to a bot forum again prepare to meet my ban hammer>> - Barotix

Topic title plawks?

Yes I do randomly search peoples names on google.
:wink:

So now we have the maker of the clientless stuff on these forums. Right under everyone's noses.

Sorry about the links, I didn't know what else to put.

JustOnePlz · **Joined:** Feb 2009 **Posts:** 262 **Location:**

Epic245 wrote:

I searched Drew_Benton in google and this came up...

<<If you ever post a link to a bot forum again prepare to meet my ban hammer>> - Barotix

First sentence plawks?

and

<<If you ever post a link to a bot forum again prepare to meet my ban hammer>> - Barotix

Topic title plawks?

Yes I do randomly search peoples names on google.
:wink:

So now we have the maker of the clientless stuff on these forums. Right under everyone's noses.

Sorry about the links, I didn't know what else to put.

DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN, thot id say it b4 this gets locked lol

SwordCloud · **Posted:** Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:39 am

Epic245 wrote:

I searched Drew_Benton in google and this came up...

<<If you ever post a link to a bot forum again prepare to meet my ban hammer>> - Barotix

First sentence plawks?

and

<<If you ever post a link to a bot forum again prepare to meet my ban hammer>> - Barotix

Topic title plawks?

Yes I do randomly search peoples names on google.
:wink:

So now we have the maker of the clientless stuff on these forums. Right under everyone's noses.

Sorry about the links, I didn't know what else to put.

Drew_Benton also made a packet sniffer etc etc.. he is just a programmer nothing else.

Epic245 · **Joined:** Jun 2009 **Posts:** 164 **Location:**

Oh okay, so it's alright to make bots, etc., just not use them, my bad.

JustOnePlz · **Joined:** Feb 2009 **Posts:** 262 **Location:**

Epic245 wrote:

Oh okay, so it's alright to make bots, etc., just not use them, my bad.

lol its ok to make crack and distribute it, just dont use it XD

SwordCloud · **Posted:** Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:49 am

Epic245 wrote:

Oh okay, so it's alright to make bots, etc., just not use them, my bad.

Make a search already topic make on him,mod don't ban him so it's okay now go back topic.

Karras · **Joined:** Nov 2008 **Posts:** 659 **Location:**

Government is against war, but they allow weapon making.
Same logic, different case.

Amarisa · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 4049 **Location:** Magic

guess botters will have to buy silk again for awhile.....

Karras wrote:

Government is against war, but they allow weapon making.
Same logic, different case.

same logic how? the government would build up arms to defend itself in case of a bad situation. its the same is america imperalizing (cant spell that word) it was all in order to defend itself in cause of harm.

TeamLosi · **Joined:** Nov 2007 **Posts:** 337 **Location:**

Amarisa wrote:

guess botters will have to buy silk again for awhile.....

what makes you think they dont? Lol ur smart

Amarisa · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 4049 **Location:** Magic

TeamLosi wrote:

Amarisa wrote:

guess botters will have to buy silk again for awhile.....

what makes you think they dont? Lol ur smart

well most people i used to talk to were all like "buy silk and you wont get banned" talked to them not to long ago. now its just "joymax doesn't care you wont get banned no need for silk". might i add with all the auto login systems botters get you don't need a premium anymore to log in.

Goseki · **Joined:** Apr 2008 **Posts:** 3452 **Location:**

you guys know this is just because of GNGWC right.... just look at the way they worded it. Sneeky Joymax :roll:

Amarisa · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 4049 **Location:** Magic

Goseki wrote:

you guys know this is just because of GNGWC right.... just look at the way they worded it. Sneeky Joymax :roll:

in fact wasn't the last "war vs bots" major event at the last GNGWC?

TeamLosi · **Joined:** Nov 2007 **Posts:** 337 **Location:**

The one where Tarky was wearing a 0x33 shirt?

Boiler · **Posted:** Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:07 am

doubt this will happend they ban all players bots joymax going to loose most of their incomm's :roll:

Extrme_G · **Joined:** Oct 2007 **Posts:** 748 **Location:**

Goseki wrote:

you guys know this is just because of GNGWC right.... just look at the way they worded it. Sneeky Joymax :roll:

This

+1

panterr · **Joined:** Oct 2008 **Posts:** 505 **Location:**

Hmm, quite interesting... Now lets turn word into acts

Toshiharu · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 4222 **Location:** Nowhere

They're just making Silkroad look good, because of GNGWC.

somaro · **Posted:** Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:41 am

They did the same last year GNGWC...

So ppl dont ask much questens and call it a bad game during GNGWC

So after GNGWC it will go back to normal

TheKnight · **Joined:** Apr 2009 **Posts:** 3067 **Location:**

When you can't log in, reinstall game?

So we need to reinstall game every day ^^

panterr · **Joined:** Oct 2008 **Posts:** 505 **Location:**

TheKnight wrote:

When you can't log in, reinstall game?

So we need to reinstall game every minute when it says server is full.^^

Fixed.

Rozelady · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 314 **Location:**

Extrme_G wrote:

3. When continuously illegal program usage is detected, the account would be restricted.

Approximately 1,700 bots have been banned.(yeh, but thats something new.. :roll:

THIS
Lol, howcome this reminds me so much of the bot banning policy back in.. 2005-6?
1st warning 1 week, 2nd warning 4 weeks, 3rd perm ban...
Copy paste anyone?

Pan_Raider(`_´) · **Joined:** Jul 2006 **Posts:** 4737 **Location:**

somaro wrote:

They did the same last year GNGWC...

So ppl dont ask much questens and call it a bad game during GNGWC

So after GNGWC it will go back to normal

lopasas · **Joined:** Nov 2008 **Posts:** 733 **Location:**

Pan_Raider(`_´) wrote:

somaro wrote:

They did the same last year GNGWC...

So ppl dont ask much questens and call it a bad game during GNGWC

So after GNGWC it will go back to normal

lol i just had to do it

Vellure · **Joined:** Jun 2009 **Posts:** 9 **Location:** Portugal

lopasas wrote:

Pan_Raider(`_´) wrote:

somaro wrote:

They did the same last year GNGWC...

So ppl dont ask much questens and call it a bad game during GNGWC

So after GNGWC it will go back to normal

lol i just had to do it

Rofl, GJ.

Well, I really hope this can have some truth |:>
...
Probably not.

Silkroad Online Forums

[Restriction Campaign of Illegal Program Usage in Silkroad]

Who is online