Azilius wrote:
penfold1992 wrote:
lol you removed the last part of the sentence which was the important part. /fail
Uh no it's not..
penfold1992 wrote:
because i was showing that there are OTHER factors.
other factors which AREN'T BACKED UP BY PROOF OR REASON.
/fail
In school you might have been taught momentum is mass x velocity.
they didint tell you that this isnt the whole story and doesnt work at speeds close to the speed of light because it was an other factor.
when people discussion the composition of air they say "oh about 80% nitrogen and 20% oxygen" but they dont say "oh and 0.000001% iodine" or "oh and traces of ammonia" because they are the "Other"
I could prove to you that the atmosphere does in fact contain traces of these but its not the main part of the picture I created when I estimated it first time. If you add those other factors together you get a bigger portion but still isnt the bulk of the issue.
its like the UK is very keen to go green but when we look at countries like india america and china its like... "whats the point?" but everything has to be taken into account at the end of the day. I cant give you any figures or values that america polutes more then the uk does either so i guess this whole thing is invalid...