BuDo wrote:
@ Fiction
Again more bias filth for the right to bare arms....I love how you convey that the operating of machinery/airplane by a blind person is dangerous but failed to use the same context/word of operating a hand gun by blind person....You instead carefully chose to use a different context such as them simply having a gun.... A blind person could have car or plane but almost never use it so your own argument is not only fallacious its quite moot....The initial argument (which you seem to be steering away from) is the danger that comes from the usage of said firearm by a blind person and not merely owning one...But your brainwashed love affair with the outdated right to bare arms won't let you observe common sense so there is no point going any further with this...
Im sorry, but you really are ignorant. You made these parameters, I simply argued your stupidly put points. Just because a blind person is allowed to own a gun does not mean they will use it, and if they did use it, the likelihood they go around shooting all over the place is just retarded. You say a lot, but you don't really ever back anything with sound reasoning. Please show me how legal gun ownership has harmed this country. Illegal gun owners cause far more problems. You're the one that comes off sheepish and indoctrinated... Alright please give me back mclovin or thedrop, dubo always gets dumb and dumber the longer his argument goes in circles.
