300? more like 1300!!!

the.unseen. · **Joined:** Feb 2006 **Posts:** 1102 **Location:**

user wrote:

the.unseen. wrote:

Blurred wrote:

user wrote:

Blurred wrote:

Either way.. sparta was still outnumbered by the persians. But also The persians had a poor army who made shields out of sticks(litterly).. Belive it or not. they were not poor, they were lightly geared because the Persian army relied on fast light infantries to do the fighting

Sparta had the better equipment. spartans just happened to wear full body armor

Persians are pretty dumb to not use siege weapons

spartans will need more than the phalanx formation when they got catapults throwing boulders at them

Most of the persians fought with virtually no body armor... How light did they wanna go? ><

the spartan fought in really the nude all they had was a red robe type thing that didn't even cover there privet parts only protection they had was a shield a sword and a helmet.

no they didn't, they had full body armor

the hoplite are the armored ones alot of the spartans wernt them (might not be correct) but some didn't fight in armor because it was to heavy for them.

user · **Posted:** Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:14 am

i got a test tomorrow, i'll dig deeper and get back at ya

Neojapan · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 88 **Location:**

satman83 wrote:

the fact that its wiki makes that link as credible as me saying that am
the king of England :roll:

i took Greek/Roman mythology in school for a year and what wiki has is correct. i checked it with my text book so like i said before......GG

ElCapuccino · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 1122

Neojapan wrote:

satman83 wrote:

the fact that its wiki makes that link as credible as me saying that am
the king of England :roll:

i took Greek/Roman mythology in school for a year and what wiki has is correct. i checked it with my text book so like i said before......GG

Wiki's never wrong.

user · **Posted:** Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:31 am

ElCapuccino wrote:

Neojapan wrote:

satman83 wrote:

the fact that its wiki makes that link as credible as me saying that am
the king of England :roll:

i took Greek/Roman mythology in school for a year and what wiki has is correct. i checked it with my text book so like i said before......GG

Wiki's never wrong.

"Wikipedia is being banned by a handful of college history departments across the country"

"Recently, the history department at Middlebury College in Vermont prohibited students from citing Wikipedia in papers, and a few other schools followed. At local colleges, while no school has announced an official ban, some individual professors are taking the lead and curtailing students' usage of Wikipedia."

source: http://www.goupstate.com/article/200704 ... 051/NEWS01

Silver · **Joined:** May 2006 **Posts:** 924 **Location:**

ElCapuccino wrote:

Neojapan wrote:

satman83 wrote:

the fact that its wiki makes that link as credible as me saying that am
the king of England :roll:

i took Greek/Roman mythology in school for a year and what wiki has is correct. i checked it with my text book so like i said before......GG

Wiki's never wrong.

it's not always accurate.

Silkroad Online Forums

300? more like 1300!!!

Who is online