JUST WATCH IT.......

darkblazer1 · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 581

Man im tired of all the bull about Muslims being Terrorists....For those of you that want to know the truth about 9/11 watch the vid below. It is 79 minutes long, and can be boring. But please watch it if you wanna know the truth.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE

HERE ANOTHER CLIP... THIS ONE IS 9MINUTES LONG AND HAS OTHER PARTS.WATCH THE FIRST PART... and then watch the others if you are convinced of the first one.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=oqEpuTGc98s

dom · **Posted:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:24 pm

And this is why: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptilian_humanoids

You'd think the people who were able to plan all this, would of been able to make a couple college students disappear.

This should tie you over until you're past the i'm-a-rebel-and-anarchist-down-with-america phase: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... y_theories

MastaChiefX · **Joined:** Nov 2006 **Posts:** 4526 **Location:** Life.

dom wrote:

And this is why: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptilian_humanoids

You'd think the people who were able to plan all this, would of been able to make a couple college students disappear.

rofl at wiki

dom · **Posted:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:27 pm

MastaChiefX wrote:

dom wrote:

And this is why: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptilian_humanoids

You'd think the people who were able to plan all this, would of been able to make a couple college students disappear.

rofl at wiki

I edited my post to include a list. There's lots of people that believe in the reptilian humanoids, there was a documentary about it on discovery, and it's as likely as the first link posted.

darkblazer1 · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 581

... enough about ur reptilian humanoids... stay on the topic.

dom · **Posted:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:36 pm

darkblazer1 wrote:

... enough about ur reptilian humanoids... stay on the topic.

I thought the topic was silly conspiracy theories that have so many holes in them, that as soon as one is chosen as a discussion topic on a nationally televised TV show, the conspirators get themselves proven wrong, embarassed, and disappear from the public's view.

Point is, the video is extremely old despite its post date. It has been debated on discussion shows on networks such as CNN, Fox, and BBC. All theories of the type are riddled with holes and have no proof other then some speculation, or unreliable/verifiable sources.

Let's face it: if the government were as sneaky and powerful as this video says, the video would of never seen the light of day. It's very own existence underminds itself.

darkblazer1 · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 581

Dude... thats just it. Have you seen the second link that i showed you? Wouldnt you think that its wierd if there a is a quick black flash on both networks at the exact time the plane crashes?

dom · **Posted:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:52 pm

impressionable students

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Bp-r4cjE7oU& ... ed&search=

If it's true: Bush is a mastermind, and the people spreading the propaganda should stop calling him a tool and idiot.

Locketart · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 2119 **Location:**

Do you actually believe Fox news?

Draquish · **Joined:** Mar 2006 **Posts:** 6423 **Location:** ____

Locketart wrote:

Do you actually believe Fox news?

I lol'd.

dom · **Posted:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:59 pm

Locketart wrote:

Do you actually believe Fox news?

It's not a question of believing fox news: it's a question of listening to his arguments, and seeing if they're effective in disproving the conspiracy theory.

But surely, you're right. College students with video editing software, drugged up hippies, and teenagers going through a rebel phase are more credible then a national news network. Thanks for picking up on that one.

Oh this is what I was looking for:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=stVmEmJ666M

Presenting your "loose change" experts.

darkblazer1 · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 581

stfu.... u domass.

Just let ppl watch it. You dont want em to know the truth about it?

dom · **Posted:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:19 pm

darkblazer1 wrote:

stfu.... u domass.

Just let ppl watch it. You dont want em to know the truth about it?

Yes, i'm from the government.

I actually hope everyone watches it, and watches both sides, then follows up with some personal reflection and personal research. Telling me to "stfu" is what you're claiming the government does to their sources.

Ell · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 3281 **Location:**

darkblazer1 wrote:

stfu.... u domass.

I lol'ed. But other than that he sounds really callow with the "you just don't want people to know" part.

Locketart · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 2119 **Location:**

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

Do you actually believe Fox news?

It's not a question of believing fox news: it's a question of listening to his arguments, and seeing if they're effective in disproving the conspiracy theory.

But surely, you're right. College students with video editing software, drugged up hippies, and teenagers going through a rebel phase are more credible then a national news network. Thanks for picking up on that one.

They're much more credible than a news network that tells its reporters what to report and in what fashion. There are written documents that tells its reporters what to say on air. The only defense that OReilly had was calling him a "nut". Nothing to really disprove the theories.

dom · **Posted:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:23 pm

Locketart wrote:

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

Do you actually believe Fox news?

It's not a question of believing fox news: it's a question of listening to his arguments, and seeing if they're effective in disproving the conspiracy theory.

But surely, you're right. College students with video editing software, drugged up hippies, and teenagers going through a rebel phase are more credible then a national news network. Thanks for picking up on that one.

They're much more credible than a news network that tells its reporters what to report and in what fashion. There are written documents that tells its reporters what to say on air. The only defense that OReilly had was calling him a "nut". Nothing to really disprove the theories.

Every news network tells their reporters what to report. Reporters are nothing more then a voice, the research is done by the news network and forwarded to the reporters.

Bill OReilly isn't trying to disprove the theories. He's trying to make the "nut" prove them, something which he is not able to do.

Locketart · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 2119 **Location:**

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

Do you actually believe Fox news?

It's not a question of believing fox news: it's a question of listening to his arguments, and seeing if they're effective in disproving the conspiracy theory.

But surely, you're right. College students with video editing software, drugged up hippies, and teenagers going through a rebel phase are more credible then a national news network. Thanks for picking up on that one.

They're much more credible than a news network that tells its reporters what to report and in what fashion. There are written documents that tells its reporters what to say on air. The only defense that OReilly had was calling him a "nut". Nothing to really disprove the theories.

Every news network tells their reporters what to report. Reporters are nothing more then a voice, the research is done by the news network and forwarded to the reporters.

Bill OReilly isn't trying to disprove the theories. He's trying to make the "nut" prove them, something which he is not able to do.

They aren't just telling their reporters what to report. They tell them to distort the news to present it in a certain way that people will conform to their point of view on things which is usually to blame a certain group of people like muslims or democrats.

dom · **Posted:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:27 pm

Locketart wrote:

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

Do you actually believe Fox news?

It's not a question of believing fox news: it's a question of listening to his arguments, and seeing if they're effective in disproving the conspiracy theory.

But surely, you're right. College students with video editing software, drugged up hippies, and teenagers going through a rebel phase are more credible then a national news network. Thanks for picking up on that one.

They're much more credible than a news network that tells its reporters what to report and in what fashion. There are written documents that tells its reporters what to say on air. The only defense that OReilly had was calling him a "nut". Nothing to really disprove the theories.

Every news network tells their reporters what to report. Reporters are nothing more then a voice, the research is done by the news network and forwarded to the reporters.

Bill OReilly isn't trying to disprove the theories. He's trying to make the "nut" prove them, something which he is not able to do.

They aren't just telling their reporters what to report. They tell them to distort the news to present it in a certain way that people will conform to their point of view on things which is usually to blame a certain group of people like muslims or democrats.

So sort of like what CNN does, but for republicans?

Locketart · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 2119 **Location:**

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

Do you actually believe Fox news?

It's not a question of believing fox news: it's a question of listening to his arguments, and seeing if they're effective in disproving the conspiracy theory.

But surely, you're right. College students with video editing software, drugged up hippies, and teenagers going through a rebel phase are more credible then a national news network. Thanks for picking up on that one.

They're much more credible than a news network that tells its reporters what to report and in what fashion. There are written documents that tells its reporters what to say on air. The only defense that OReilly had was calling him a "nut". Nothing to really disprove the theories.

Every news network tells their reporters what to report. Reporters are nothing more then a voice, the research is done by the news network and forwarded to the reporters.

Bill OReilly isn't trying to disprove the theories. He's trying to make the "nut" prove them, something which he is not able to do.

They aren't just telling their reporters what to report. They tell them to distort the news to present it in a certain way that people will conform to their point of view on things which is usually to blame a certain group of people like muslims or democrats.

So sort of like what CNN does, but for republicans?

They are both trash, Nancy Grace has 1 point of view on things and when she's wrong she doesn't reply or apologize. I'm glad you agree with me then. Try not to quote Fox as a reliable source ever again.

Draquish · **Joined:** Mar 2006 **Posts:** 6423 **Location:** ____

darkblazer1 wrote:

stfu.... u domass.

Just let ppl watch it. You dont want em to know the truth about it?

dom wrote:

I got a certificate from the ministry for graduating with an A average, along with my bilingual diploma ^^

satman83 · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 9541 **Location:** London

[SD]draquish wrote:

darkblazer1 wrote:

stfu.... u domass.

Just let ppl watch it. You dont want em to know the truth about it?

dom wrote:

I got a certificate from the ministry for graduating with an A average, along with my bilingual diploma ^^

ummmm i think the word "owned" springs to mind...

Locketart · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 2119 **Location:**

[SD]draquish wrote:

darkblazer1 wrote:

stfu.... u domass.

Just let ppl watch it. You dont want em to know the truth about it?

dom wrote:

I got a certificate from the ministry for graduating with an A average, along with my bilingual diploma ^^

Fluent in 2 languages yet he doesn't know how to punctuate, lol.

avanti42 · **Joined:** Nov 2006 **Posts:** 252 **Location:**

Do you realise how offensive this conspiracy shit is to the people who died in 9/11.

multiple dousche bags have shown me this video claiming it to 100% legit when ive seen the whole story completely made to be bullshit by many people

MastaChiefX · **Joined:** Nov 2006 **Posts:** 4526 **Location:** Life.

Wow.
You belive this?
Dont breed. EVER.

grap3s04wr · **Posted:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:50 pm

Locketart wrote:

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

dom wrote:

Locketart wrote:

Do you actually believe Fox news?

It's not a question of believing fox news: it's a question of listening to his arguments, and seeing if they're effective in disproving the conspiracy theory.

But surely, you're right. College students with video editing software, drugged up hippies, and teenagers going through a rebel phase are more credible then a national news network. Thanks for picking up on that one.

They're much more credible than a news network that tells its reporters what to report and in what fashion. There are written documents that tells its reporters what to say on air. The only defense that OReilly had was calling him a "nut". Nothing to really disprove the theories.

Every news network tells their reporters what to report. Reporters are nothing more then a voice, the research is done by the news network and forwarded to the reporters.

Bill OReilly isn't trying to disprove the theories. He's trying to make the "nut" prove them, something which he is not able to do.

They aren't just telling their reporters what to report. They tell them to distort the news to present it in a certain way that people will conform to their point of view on things which is usually to blame a certain group of people like muslims or democrats.

So sort of like what CNN does, but for republicans?

They are both trash, Nancy Grace has 1 point of view on things and when she's wrong she doesn't reply or apologize. I'm glad you agree with me then. Try not to quote Fox as a reliable source ever again.

this one looooooooooooooooong quote

and btw 9 / 11 was probably a controlled 'splosion, its way too obvious all the steel melting and stuff like that or there was hydrogen bomb in the towers

either way its happened its in the past and we really should all forget about it

avanti42 · **Joined:** Nov 2006 **Posts:** 252 **Location:**

^ dude wtf are you thinking that the planes crashing were just for effect???

and that the government planned it so we could invade the middle east for oil well newsflash im still paying 3 bucks a gallon at the pumps

Locketart · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 2119 **Location:**

Personally, the only evidence that I've seen that I really believe is that the steel beams in the basement were melted using thermite which is probably the only thing hot enough to melt it, but if jet engine fuel burns hot enough to melt steel beams, let me know. I won't even go into what happened at the pentagon because most of you will yell "bs".

Draquish · **Joined:** Mar 2006 **Posts:** 6423 **Location:** ____

I love how the human mind likes to embark on a journey through darkness because "there MUST be something there". :roll:

dom · **Posted:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:09 pm

Locketart wrote:

[SD]draquish wrote:

darkblazer1 wrote:

stfu.... u domass.

Just let ppl watch it. You dont want em to know the truth about it?

dom wrote:

I got a certificate from the ministry for graduating with an A average, along with my bilingual diploma ^^

Fluent in 2 languages yet he doesn't know how to punctuate, lol.

All it requires here is 4 EAU classes with every other class taken in french. Sorry english isn't my mother language, I do my best to make sure people can understand me.

grap3s04wr · **Posted:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:10 pm

avanti42 wrote:

^ dude wtf are you thinking that the planes crashing were just for effect???

and that the government planned it so we could invade the middle east for oil well newsflash im still paying 3 bucks a gallon at the pumps

no and yes

i think the planes were real but some conspiracy theorists even think they were just missiles hologramed to look like planes but w/e

yes i think it was for oil i mean the whole invasion of afghanistan / iraq, if no WMDS were ever found meaning bush directly lied about his motive and about the invasion then what's the REAL point of being there?

why are they still there now? lives are being lost uneccessarily imo

Silkroad Online Forums

JUST WATCH IT.......

Who is online