Silkroad Online Forums

Or starvation.
Or murder?
We'd use up too many minutes. I agree though, of course it's terrible, but spending these billions on the "war on terror" rather than NASA, Cancer Research, or various charity organizations can be called plainly retarded imo.

Silo, please stick to just posting in ghost, quantum theory, and asian faggotry music threads.

@Squirt:
Ok.

Tool for war and the purpose said war serves is to put the american people in debt, this process achieves a huge transfer of wealth but more importantly creates a serving mass ( could be described as modern slaves ).

Nothing new or creative, btw kiss your money as it is awesome.

So he rammed a plane into another building about the same size and same construction methods as the twin towers and found out it didn't collapse?

Think the other theory is something about not being able to afford the cost of the Towers (they needed a huge renovation, don't remember why). Like the architecture was farked from the beginning and it was really expansive to manage them.

EDIT: Oh and the footage with smoke comming out before the tower would ever reach "x" floor was kinda creepy

I can easily see the buildings collapsing from the planes crashing in them. Not from the initial impact, but from the jet fuel. Jet fuel is like oil and gas mixed(only a comparison, not a real formula), burns well and slowly. With the temperatures very high and heating the beams, its only time before they begin to bend, this weakens a section, then it can't handle the load and collapses and causes a chain reaction.

Steel melts at 2500 F, alumi. is 1220 F, So being exposed to 600 F temperature for that amount of time can make it weak

No he studied materials, structures, history and many more things you have not and can tell me unbiasedly that structures don't suddenly collapse into a neat little package after being exposed to fire for 8 hours, that is an insult to modern architecture.

If it means anything to you my father has over 15 years of experience and has actually worked on multiple standing buildings ( 2 ), not some1 who picked up his degree and changed professions or works on just floor planning.

Cool story on how we see people at location reporting bombs going off and don't make anything of that.

I just got done watch V for vendetta before I saw this thread.

Nope doesn't really mean much to me seeing as I don't understand much of anything about architecture. However I also do not believe everything I see on TV. So in a way I agree with you. I was pointing out that you can't be sure it isn't absolutely impossible, but extremely unlikely I agree with. When you start to believe everything on TV, you are indeed being controlled by the sold out media picking up paychecks from the government. That comes from my Uncle that was in the Air force since his 18th birthday. He's now 60 something. Quite a bit of experience there as well I'd imagine.

Sorry but, i don't see anything wrong with Silo post.

and why would I do that?

Love I thought you were talking about WTC building 7... Now you are telling me the twin towers were a set up as well? and I suppose the bombings that took place in Europe following 9/11 were also the U.S government... Why don't you and your dad take the same amount of time you guys took to youtube it... and youtube what "actually" happened on 9/11... 15 years working in architecture doesn't make him an expert on what would happen if a plane flew into a building-might make him an expert on what happens if a strong wind hit it, but not a 747... Besides he's just an architect right? He's not a physicist.

Fiction how smart do you feel ^^

I feel smarter than someone that believes our own government was behind 9/11...

@Miro:
I really can't imagine why not.

@Silo:
Figure that out for yourself.

@9/11 Hoax:
Too much "Zeitgeist."

Yup, spending billions of dollars to keep your ass safe is plain retarded.

<--against iraq war

It happened many times before in history though =O

the 5th of November

To keep your ass safe?
Are you farking retarded?
There were more deaths in Chicago this year (gun-deaths at least) than in Baghdad. For god sakes, our domestic problems > insurgency problems in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Of course they are both terrible, but our country right now is spending billions "keeping our ass safe" when we don't have all that much to worry about. Spending that many billions on bombs is pretty much an insult to the poor, to the people who can't eat, to the people who aren't clothed. We can keep "our ass safe" by not sending our troops to the middle east, by defending ourselves with defensive mechanisms rather than this failing "war on terror" (which isn't even a war, considering wars are between nations).

We can still post here? Fantastic. It's September 12th, btw.

for aloooot of reasons! =)

The whole point of the war on terror is to prevent attacks on the US, and it seems like its working, no? I don't see how spending billions to keep "poor, people who can't eat, people who aren't clothed" safe is an insult to them.

I think the Iraq war was/is unnecessary, but the whole war on terror, not so much.
And wars are between groups, which can be nations.

Nope, between nations. Look it up.
And keeping them safe? Good joke? More people die in Chicago like I already said than to terrorists/insurgents.

then it's worthless to post here.

It's in the past.. but it should never be forgotten.

My friend posted something interesting on Facebook..

"I just love how for one day a year everyone pretends to be patriotic hah! God bless America right?"

Made me think a little