SRF's 2010 Awards [Teaser]

Tasdik · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 13206 **Location:** Life

Prophet Izaach wrote:

The award should be a unique title that replaces the one above your avatar. Should last til the end of the year then it all goes back to normal.

This would apply to the winner of every category?

CeLL · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:29 am

Prophet Izaach wrote:

The award should be a unique title that replaces the one above your avatar. Should last til the end of the year then it all goes back to normal.

fuck that. it should stay until you request to be banned.

Love · **Joined:** Nov 2007 **Posts:** 5336 **Location:**

I know of an award I am much deserving of and if I don't get it heads will roll, no pressure, I'm just saying.

CeLL · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:47 am

least creative avatar and sig?
if not that, than certainly it should be best person quoted in their sig.

iSinnnn · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:54 am

Tasdik · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 13206 **Location:** Life

CeLL wrote:

least creative avatar and sig?
if not that, than certainly it should be best person quoted in their sig.

Eh, I'm not a huge fan of that quote. Really just the last part about research. There are so many things we can't prove/research on our own simply because we lack the means to do so. Which means we kind of have to rely on others research. But doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose? Maybe?

*shrugs*

Mirosuke · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:46 am

So how about we give award title ideas?
Like: The troll-est :sohappy:

or the Quick Replier (People who often make short comments as lol, wut, etc), or whatever... :sohappy:

This gonna be fun.

Skyve · **Joined:** Apr 2006 **Posts:** 7328 **Location:** Canada

Mirosuke wrote:

So how about we give award title ideas?
Like: The troll-est :sohappy:

or the Quick Replier (People who often make short comments as lol, wut, etc), or whatever... :sohappy:

This gonna be fun.

Well the Awards are already made, have them all ready. As for Titles, I'll PM RuYi about it.

Mirosuke · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:56 am

ExSoldier wrote:

Mirosuke wrote:

So how about we give award title ideas?
Like: The troll-est :sohappy:

or the Quick Replier (People who often make short comments as lol, wut, etc), or whatever... :sohappy:

This gonna be fun.

Well the Awards are already made, have them all ready. As for Titles, I'll PM RuYi about it.

Lol all o-o sounds so intriguing.

XMoshe · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:59 am

Dammit tell us already! :rant:

satman83 · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 9541 **Location:** London

And the award for best game news poster goes to :yay:

Hostage · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:54 am

XMoshe wrote:

Community will vote? Won't have a chance then since I'm a ghost :[

We could always recreate the pottery scene, if it made Patrick Swayze famous it could work for you. :wink:

satman83 · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 9541 **Location:** London

Hostage wrote:

XMoshe wrote:

Community will vote? Won't have a chance then since I'm a ghost :[

We could always recreate the pottery scene, if it made Patrick Swayze famous it could work for you. :wink:

you voluntaring to be Demi Moore? :sohappy:

Krevidy · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:54 pm

Burningwolf wrote:

Master_of_Puppets wrote:

I'm sure I can win the most ignored member from 2007, and above 1k posts! hahaha

yeah...no

Hostage · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:58 pm

satman83 wrote:

you voluntaring to be Demi Moore? :sohappy:

I'll need to get a haircut and a bra but I wouldn't have it any other way.

CeLL · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:57 pm

Tasdik wrote:

CeLL wrote:

least creative avatar and sig?
if not that, than certainly it should be best person quoted in their sig.

Eh, I'm not a huge fan of that quote. Really just the last part about research. There are so many things we can't prove/research on our own simply because we lack the means to do so. Which means we kind of have to rely on others research. But doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose? Maybe?

*shrugs*

I disagree. What you say sounds like it belongs in the category of lazy, not lacking resources. We have the resources.

Doron · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:20 pm

I do still wonder what the categories are..

I'm picturing it a bit like this, Grammys style:

Category e-quarrels:

- Best Troll
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

- Best Comeback
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

- Best flame
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

- Best winning argument
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

Tasdik · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 13206 **Location:** Life

CeLL wrote:

I disagree. What you say sounds like it belongs in the category of lazy, not lacking resources. We have the resources.

I'm not talking about "we". I'm talking about you. Do you have the ability to go into a laboratory and conduct thousands upon thousands of experiments there?

I think not.

Doron wrote:

I do still wonder what the categories are..

I'm picturing it a bit like this, Grammys style:

Category e-quarrels:

- Best Troll
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

- Best Comeback
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

- Best flame
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

- Best winning argument
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

Seems far to difficult. Who has the time/wants to search through everyone's posts to find a certain quote they thought was hilarious?

Not me.

CeLL · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:20 pm

Tasdik wrote:

CeLL wrote:

I disagree. What you say sounds like it belongs in the category of lazy, not lacking resources. We have the resources.

I'm not talking about "we". I'm talking about you. Do you have the ability to go into a laboratory and conduct thousands upon thousands of experiments there?

I think not.

No I cant. But that doesn’t mean I have to assume that because someone else CAN that they are being entirely honest or doesn’t have an agenda that encourages them to find a way to come to their conclusions.

Doron · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:25 pm

Tasdik wrote:

CeLL wrote:

I disagree. What you say sounds like it belongs in the category of lazy, not lacking resources. We have the resources.

I'm not talking about "we". I'm talking about you. Do you have the ability to go into a laboratory and conduct thousands upon thousands of experiments there?

I think not.

Doron wrote:

I do still wonder what the categories are..

I'm picturing it a bit like this, Grammys style:

Category e-quarrels:

- Best Troll
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

- Best Comeback
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

- Best flame
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

- Best winning argument
Nominees: *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote*, *insert name* with *quote* and *insert name* with *quote*.

Seems far to difficult. Who has the time/wants to search through everyone's posts to find a certain quote they thought was hilarious?

Not me.

Yeah okay but maybe Ex did, and is he collecting old quotes as we speak.

You never know, but I think that would be awesome.

I don't have any other idea how he would/could/should do it.

CeLL · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:31 pm

i imagine he would do it satirically. i dont see this as being a serious matter.

Doron · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:00 pm

CeLL wrote:

satirically.

Don't make up words dear.

CeLL · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:18 pm

stop masturbating to pictures of yourself long enough to pick up a dictionary.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/satirically

sa·tir·i·cal /səˈtɪrɪkəl/ Show Spelled
[suh-tir-i-kuhl] Show IPA

–adjective
1. of, pertaining to, containing, or characterized by satire: satirical novels.
2. indulging in or given to satire: a satirical poet.
Use satirically in a Sentence
See images of satirically
Search satirically on the Web
Also, sa·tir·ic.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Origin:
1520–30; < LL satiric ( us ) ( satir ( a ) satire + -icus -ic) + -al1

—Related forms
sa·tir·i·cal·ly, adverb
sa·tir·i·cal·ness, noun
non·sa·tir·ic, adjective
non·sa·tir·i·cal, adjective
non·sa·tir·i·cal·ly, adverb
non·sa·tir·i·cal·ness, noun
pseu·do·sa·tir·i·cal, adjective
pseu·do·sa·tir·i·cal·ly, adverb
qua·si-sa·tir·i·cal, adjective
qua·si-sa·tir·i·cal·ly, adverb
sem·i·sa·tir·ic, adjective
sem·i·sa·tir·i·cal, adjective
sem·i·sa·tir·i·cal·ly, adverb
sub·sa·tir·ic, adjective
sub·sa·tir·i·cal, adjective
sub·sa·tir·i·cal·ly, adverb
sub·sa·tir·i·cal·ness, noun
un·sa·tir·ic, adjective
un·sa·tir·i·cal, adjective
un·sa·tir·i·cal·ly, adverb
un·sa·tir·i·cal·ness, noun

—Synonyms
1. sardonic, ironical, taunting, cutting, mordant, biting, acid. See cynical.

Doron · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:39 pm

But I'm so hot and everytime people use a hard word I can just as well say you made it up so you'll post proof that it is a word.

XMoshe · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:08 pm

Nah face it Doron, you got burned by the troll.

CeLL · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:30 pm

XMoshe wrote:

Nah face it Doron, you got burned by the troll.

I think he is under the impression it is the other way around.

Isis · **Joined:** Apr 2006 **Posts:** 4171 **Location:**

I haven't got a clue what is going on in this thread, but hey :yay:

CeLL · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:41 pm

Isis wrote:

I haven't got a clue what is going on in this thread, but hey :yay:

seriously. is your browser translating in russian or something?

Krevidy · **Posted:** Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:45 pm

CeLL wrote:

stop masturbating to pictures of yourself long enough to pick up a dictionary.

Winrar.

Isis · **Joined:** Apr 2006 **Posts:** 4171 **Location:**

CeLL wrote:

Isis wrote:

I haven't got a clue what is going on in this thread, but hey :yay:

seriously. is your browser translating in russian or something?

The thread started off, SRF Awards. But like every other thread finished off, with all pick on Doron. Which okay, but it gets boring...

Silkroad Online Forums

SRF's 2010 Awards [Teaser]

Who is online