Ashikiheyun wrote:
heroo wrote:
RuYi wrote:
heroo wrote:
Ashikiheyun wrote:
heroo wrote:
Ashikiheyun wrote:
heroo wrote:
imagine:
you arrested a terrorist who placed a bomb in the middle of Times Square. He knows where the bomb is but he won't tell you. The bomb will explode within 24 hours, and when it does, thousands of innocent people will die.
What would you do ? I think i would use torture methods.
In extreme cases like that, yes. But if you use examples like that you can win in most arguments.
wouldn't you use torture methods just to safe
one innocent life ?
Would the torture kill the other
person?
The thing I'm trying to say is that the shit the US does is like hooking wires up to prisoners, standing them up against a board and saying if they moved they would be electrocuted and leave them there for hours while the wires are hook up to nothing.
interesting you call people like those '' persons ''. If they are guilty indeed, I'd rather call them '' monsters ''
That's a matter of opinion.
What is a terrorist to one, is a fighter for freedom to another.
/Ontopic
Torture is a wrong thing to do. And those methods shouldn't be used by anyone, not -in this situation- the USA, nor the terrorists.
how can someone that kills innocent people be a freedom fighter ? A freedom fighter is someone who fights against a force that is occupieng his country.
I agree with the point RuYi is making, especially her last post.
Oh and a freedom fighter is someone who fights against a force occupying their country? What is the US doing in Iraq basically?
that is exactly what I mean, people that are fighting the U.S in Iraq, you can call freedom fighters, but when someone comes and kills innocent people that have nothing to do with the war, you can't call a freedom fighter.
And again, there is no good reason for killing 3000 innocent lifes.
You're only looking on one side. That's why you don't understand what I mean.
