|
Silkroad Online
|
Silkroad Forums
|
Affiliates
|



|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
user
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 7:49 pm |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 3053 Location: A place far far away
|
which one is "there is only one will, mine."?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
user
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 7:54 pm |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 3053 Location: A place far far away
|
depends whos up in the social class right? if i am in the working class, i would want a democrat/liberal to be in power
if i am a leader, i will tell ppl to shove the constitution up ppl's arses
|
|
Top |
|
 |
woutR
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 7:59 pm |
|
Elite Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 5573 Location: Netherlands
|
Well in Holland I am a liberal (VVD) but I wouldn't vote for the democrats in the USA, I don't really think they're all that liberal and some of their ideas sound like socialistic crap to me.
Edit,
User, FYI: A true liberal wouldn't do shit for the working class, whereas a socialist would.
_________________

<< >>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
hellsharpt
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:04 pm |
|
Ex-Staff |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 3003 Location: Khadgar
|
republican!
and nice quote woutR, lol
|
|
Top |
|
 |
user
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:06 pm |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 3053 Location: A place far far away
|
woutR wrote: User, FYI: A true liberal wouldn't do shit for the working class, whereas a socialist would.
liberal is for democracy, a true conservative would be a fascist, sucks to be a citizen in a fascist state, i know, i played civilization 3
|
|
Top |
|
 |
svante
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:09 pm |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 137 Location:
|
Well, I consider myself as a liberal, because in the end, it's all up to oneself. I'm sick of people blaiming society for X and Y.
_________________ Olympus (svante): Pure str Blade [lvl 2x] Guild: SwiftJustice [lvl 2] Status: ACTIVE
|
|
Top |
|
 |
woutR
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:16 pm |
|
Elite Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 5573 Location: Netherlands
|
user wrote: woutR wrote: User, FYI: A true liberal wouldn't do shit for the working class, whereas a socialist would. liberal is for democracy, a true conservative would be a fascist, sucks to be a citizen in a fascist state, i know, i played civilization 3
yes, but that still doesn't mean you should vote liberal if you're from the working class.
_________________

<< >>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
hellsharpt
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:22 pm |
|
Ex-Staff |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 3003 Location: Khadgar
|
Having a president be a member of a party other than democrat or republican would be a disaster in the US. It's hard enough when the House and Senate majorities are not of the same as the acting President. If someone affiliated with neither party was in office they would have no support, and nothing would get done.
Besides all the independant or 'green' canidates have been nut jobs (ex. Nader, and the big eared, funny talking guy whose name I can't remember right now).
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bakemaster
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:34 pm |
|
Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 4732 Location:
|
Yeah, Nader's a total nutjob. Seatbelts suck. Ever been in a car accident, hells?
_________________ LOL
|
|
Top |
|
 |
woutR
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:40 pm |
|
Elite Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 5573 Location: Netherlands
|
ThatOneMan3424 wrote: that means everyone that has a job and works would vote democratic? then how do we have a republican president
EDIT: I have to leave and go to the NHS (National Honor Society) Induction Ceremony since i was accpeted and i will be back on tomorrow to post some more stuff in here
If the democrats would be liberal( and from what I've read and seen, they're not as liberal as I like) then your conclusion, the bold part, would be exactly what I think is best.
_________________

<< >>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
hellsharpt
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:43 pm |
|
Ex-Staff |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 3003 Location: Khadgar
|
Bakemaster wrote: Yeah, Nader's a total nutjob. Seatbelts suck. Ever been in a car accident, hells?
Yes, 2 years ago on thanksgiving. The SUV I was in rolled 3 times after sliding on black ice. I was not belted in. Nor was my dog. My wife was. The dog died, I was injured superficially, my wife was bruised. Lets just say I was REALLY REALLY REALLY lucky
I think wearing a sealt belt is unconstitutional, but since then I wear it every time I get in a car.
But what does advocacy of seat belts have to do with politics?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
ShizKnight
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 9:19 pm |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 3104 Location: _______
|
Bakemaster wrote: Yeah, Nader's a total nutjob. Seatbelts suck. Ever been in a car accident, hells?
At least he's persistent.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bakemaster
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 9:20 pm |
|
Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 4732 Location:
|
Wearing a seat belt is unconstitutional? I'm sorry, what? I'm not gonna cut you slack just cause I like you personally. If you want to step up and talk politics you're gonna need to bring your A-game, not some "oh lol u no wut I meant" bullshit. You can't remember the name of a man who took almost 20% of the popular vote in 1992 and don't even care enough to Google it, yet somehow you feel competent to weigh in on the subject? I don't know what to say.
_________________ LOL
|
|
Top |
|
 |
woutR
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 10:34 pm |
|
Elite Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 5573 Location: Netherlands
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Quyxz
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 11:08 pm |
|
Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 2369 Location: The Netherlands
|
I'm on the right in dutch politics. 
_________________
One oldskool matherfacker
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Jstar1
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 11:41 pm |
|
Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 4757 Location:
|
I don't even know what liberal or conservative means
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Kitty
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 12:02 am |
|
Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 1818 Location: MA/PA
|
I'm independent.
_________________ Facebook/Wii addict
ITG2 player
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Stress
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 9:01 am |
|
Ex-Staff |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4599 Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
|
I am central in romanian politics 
_________________ Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
durant
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 4:01 pm |
|
Casual Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 70 Location:
|
Bakemaster wrote: Wearing a seat belt is unconstitutional? I'm sorry, what? I'm not gonna cut you slack just cause I like you personally. If you want to step up and talk politics you're gonna need to bring your A-game, not some "oh lol u no wut I meant" bullshit. You can't remember the name of a man who took almost 20% of the popular vote in 1992 and don't even care enough to Google it, yet somehow you feel competent to weigh in on the subject? I don't know what to say.
Seatbelt laws can be considered unconstitutional because they are "victimless crimes." You not wearing a seatbelt doesn't harm anyone else directly, whereas there are other actions that do.
_________________ Level 6x Int-Hybrid Sword
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Stallowned
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 4:09 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 4561 Location: aeratadfer
|
If you get in a crash in a car full of people, you not wearing your seatbelt and your body flying around the car can easily "harm" someone.
If you die or get seriously injured, your family + friends are victims and have to deal with your death.
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
LittleTom
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 4:15 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 638 Location: Life
|
libretarian FTW
Edit: Libretarian. not liberal. HUGE difference
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Bakemaster
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 7:17 pm |
|
Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 4732 Location:
|
durant wrote: Bakemaster wrote: Wearing a seat belt is unconstitutional? I'm sorry, what? I'm not gonna cut you slack just cause I like you personally. If you want to step up and talk politics you're gonna need to bring your A-game, not some "oh lol u no wut I meant" bullshit. You can't remember the name of a man who took almost 20% of the popular vote in 1992 and don't even care enough to Google it, yet somehow you feel competent to weigh in on the subject? I don't know what to say. Seatbelt laws can be considered unconstitutional because they are "victimless crimes." You not wearing a seatbelt doesn't harm anyone else directly, whereas there are other actions that do.
That's not the point. I know what he meant. I'm talking about what he said. Not the same thing, and that's a problem.
_________________ LOL
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Blackchocob0
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 8:11 pm |
|
Addicted Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 2840 Location: HIV, CA
|
I find it foolish to identify with only one group; most who do don't think for themselves, they just take in what the party tells them to take in.
I'm independant.
_________________ Peace.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
ThatOneMan3424
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 8:12 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 652 Location:
|
Blackchocob0 wrote: I find it foolish to identify with only one group; most who do don't think for themselves, they just take in what the party tells them to take in.
I'm independant.
so u vote for Nader (spelling)....well that is if ur in the united states lol
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Blackchocob0
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 8:59 pm |
|
Addicted Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 2840 Location: HIV, CA
|
Or I don't vote. By Independant I only mean that I don't identify with a single parties ideals. I have my own ideals. I may or may not agree with the person running under the Independant party identification.
_________________ Peace.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|