|
|
Silkroad Online
|
|
Silkroad Forums
|
|
Affiliates
|



|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
| Author |
Message |
|
Spanktastik
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:39 pm |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 689 Location:
|
thanks jerks, i got a headache now lol 
_________________
 Forever an Avalonian.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
PsYch008
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:40 pm |
|
| Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 4451 Location: reno
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
skyduck
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:51 pm |
|
| Casual Member |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 74 Location:
|
This math thing is really interesting. I am not a math person and I have no idea if 0.(9) = 1 or not and I have no intention to prove whatsoever... but a quick look on google and after a few readings I found this... This make sense to me and I am buying this...
http://mathcentral.uregina.ca/qq/databa ... rine1.html
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pinoyplaya
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:15 am |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 595 Location:
|
|
my teachers found this concept hard to believe as well since the 9's are continuous to infinity but has its limit at infinity. However, they think that there is a law that you cannot add, subtract, divide, or multiply anything from infinity since infinity is not a number.
WTF? Why not render infinity useless? If its not a number then what is it?
Im gonna take a picture of the work I did and that is how it should be done, creating a new mathematical concept where infinity can be used and be added, subtracted, multiplied, and divide. I'll post it later today, I have to do the work first wakaka if anyone cares.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pinoyplaya
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:41 am |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 595 Location:
|
Here's the proof including the new concept that should be added in math world.
Sorry if the image was too big, I should have shot it in 3 megapixels instead of 5 but was in a hurry and didnt want to edit it.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Telankesy
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:59 am |
|
| Hi, I'm New Here |
 |
Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 7
|
|
umm just wondering here pinoyplaya... what grade are you in and what grade is your teacher in?
ever heard of imaginary numbers?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pinoyplaya
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:14 am |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 595 Location:
|
|
I'm a senior. Yes, Ive heard of imaginary numbers and infinity is NOT an imaginary number. It's not even a number but rather nonexistent. And your point is....?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
EliteHealer
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:37 am |
|
| Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 116 Location:
|
pinoyplaya wrote: zphantom wrote: MastaChiefX wrote: ok here is how it goes down .1111(repeating)= X X * 10 = 9.99(repeating) 10X - 1X= 9 9 / 9 = 1 So .99(repeating) = 1.
Just basic fundamental math. x = 0.9999(repeat) 10x = 9.999(repeat) 10x-x = 9.999(repeat)-0.999(repeat) 9x = 9 x = 1 This is completely wrong........ Now, say put a limit to how much it 99999 repeats, say 10 9's because if you have an infinite 9's, and you multiply that by 10, your decimal 9's is infinitiy - 1 (infinity minus 1) because multiplying the number by ten moves the decimal point once to the right. What does that mean? Ok, here's how it goes, its very hard to explain unless you put a limit to infinity. But Ill try to explain it this way.... X = 0.999999999 (repeating to infinity sets of 9) 10X = 9.999999999 but the decimal 9's is one less than infinity because you moved one of them to take place of zero. So.... 10X - 9.999999 which is the same thing as 9.999999999 (repeating except decimal 9's is one less than infinity) - 0.99999999 (repeating to infinity). Which means, you are subtracting 0.999999999 (repeating to infinity) from 9.9999999999 where the .9999999999 is one less than infinity. What you will always get is 8.9999999999999991 where 9's are repeating to infinity minus 1. which is not equal to 9 unless you round it. So 8.99999999999999991 where 9 is repeating to infinity minus 1 is not equal to 9 thus X is not equal to 1 because 9X is not 9. Want me to explain this by limiting the number of 9's? Okay, here it goes. Lets just do five set of 9's pretending that infinity is five. X = 0.99999 (count how many 9's I have) 10X = 9.9999 (count how many 9's again, and count how many are after the decimal point. This shows that if there was an infinite number of 9's, when you multiply it by ten, your new decimal 9's is one less than infinity) 10X - X (lets put in the numbers on this one) 9.9999 - 0.99999 = 8.99991 (like I said, you will always get that number where the set of 9's is always going to be one less than infinity which is correct, our infinity was 5 and how many 9's do we have? 4) So 9X is not 9 but rather 8.99991 or if the 9's where repeating to infinity then 9X is equal to 8.99999999999999999999999999999999999991 where 9 is repeating to one less than infinity And because 9X = 8.99991 in this case, X = 0.99999 not 1. So X is the same value as it was before, it didnt even change. Prove me wrong, I'd like to see what you come up with. Unless you guys were just messing with people, I guess you dont have to prove me wrong. But then again, if you didnt get what I said (explained) then you probably will not agree with my proof. But it is 100% CORRECT
You make a fundamental mistake.
0.999... has an infinite number of decimals. That is not the same as "a lot" or "very, very many", but an -infinite- amount of decimals. And mathematically speaking, infinity - 1 = infinity.
Therefore his proof is indeed correct, and it is one of many, many proofs that 0.999... = 1. Here are a few of them:
The Algebraic Proof
c = 0.999...
10c = 9.999...
10c - c = 9.999... - 0.999...
9c = 9
0.999... = 1
The Fraction Proof
1/3 = 0.333...
3 x 0.333... = 3 x 1/3 = (3 x 1)/3
0.999... = 1
Proof using infinite series
A decimal progression can be defined as a sum of infinite series, as follows:
b0.b1b2b3... = b0 + b1(1/10) + b2(1/10)^2 + b3(1/10)^3...
For an infinite progression you simply use the convergence theorem concerning infinite geometric series:
If |r|<1 the ar + ar^2 + ar^3 + ... = ar/(1-r)
0.999... is such a sum, with the common ratio 1/10, which makes:
0.999... = 9(1/10) + 9(1/10)^2 + 9(1/10)^3 + ... = 9(1/10)/(1-1/10) = 1.
More proofs that 0.999... = 1 can be found in any mathematical textbook, but I leave those up to you. Look up Cauchy sequences is you want to.
A logical deduction that doesn't use any kind of algebra can also easily be made. If 0.999... has an infinite amount of decimals, it must be so close to 1 that there is no number small enough to "fill the gap" between 0.999... and 1 - because for such a number to exist, the 0.999... sequence must have a finite amount of decimals. Therefore 0.999... = 1.
_________________ IGN: MsAssassin
Lvl: 3x
Build: on my way to an 83% INT hybrid
IGN: Sophia777 (on vacation)
Lvl: 2x
Build: healer
STR/Force/Fire/Lightning/Blade
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Bakemaster
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:51 am |
|
| Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 4732 Location:
|
|
The algebraic proof in the above post does NOT prove that point-nine-bar equals one, it proves that the rules of basic algebra do not apply when dealing with infinite concepts.
The fraction proof in the above post is pure bullshit. Three multiplied by point-three-bar does NOT equal point-nine-bar, it equals one. Once again, all that is proven is that the rules of basic algebra do not apply in this situation. You didn't even do it with fractions, you just changed the fraction to a decimal approximation and fudged the numbers.
I can't comment on your "infinite series" proof because I don't feel like diving back into old textbooks to check up on the theorem you used, but I suspect it too merely proves that basic algebra is a limited branch of mathematics.
Your logical deduction is just not logical. There IS a number that "fills in the gap" between point-nine-bar and 1. It's point-zero-bar-one. Which is the solution to 1 minus point-nine-bar. It is in an infinitely small number, like a zero-dimensional point in space; just because it has no length, breadth or width doesn't mean the point does not exist. The same logic applies to point-zero-bar-one.
_________________ LOL
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pinoyplaya
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:57 am |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 595 Location:
|
EliteHealer wrote: pinoyplaya wrote: zphantom wrote: MastaChiefX wrote: ok here is how it goes down .1111(repeating)= X X * 10 = 9.99(repeating) 10X - 1X= 9 9 / 9 = 1 So .99(repeating) = 1.
Just basic fundamental math. x = 0.9999(repeat) 10x = 9.999(repeat) 10x-x = 9.999(repeat)-0.999(repeat) 9x = 9 x = 1 This is completely wrong........ Now, say put a limit to how much it 99999 repeats, say 10 9's because if you have an infinite 9's, and you multiply that by 10, your decimal 9's is infinitiy - 1 (infinity minus 1) because multiplying the number by ten moves the decimal point once to the right. What does that mean? Ok, here's how it goes, its very hard to explain unless you put a limit to infinity. But Ill try to explain it this way.... X = 0.999999999 (repeating to infinity sets of 9) 10X = 9.999999999 but the decimal 9's is one less than infinity because you moved one of them to take place of zero. So.... 10X - 9.999999 which is the same thing as 9.999999999 (repeating except decimal 9's is one less than infinity) - 0.99999999 (repeating to infinity). Which means, you are subtracting 0.999999999 (repeating to infinity) from 9.9999999999 where the .9999999999 is one less than infinity. What you will always get is 8.9999999999999991 where 9's are repeating to infinity minus 1. which is not equal to 9 unless you round it. So 8.99999999999999991 where 9 is repeating to infinity minus 1 is not equal to 9 thus X is not equal to 1 because 9X is not 9. Want me to explain this by limiting the number of 9's? Okay, here it goes. Lets just do five set of 9's pretending that infinity is five. X = 0.99999 (count how many 9's I have) 10X = 9.9999 (count how many 9's again, and count how many are after the decimal point. This shows that if there was an infinite number of 9's, when you multiply it by ten, your new decimal 9's is one less than infinity) 10X - X (lets put in the numbers on this one) 9.9999 - 0.99999 = 8.99991 (like I said, you will always get that number where the set of 9's is always going to be one less than infinity which is correct, our infinity was 5 and how many 9's do we have? 4) So 9X is not 9 but rather 8.99991 or if the 9's where repeating to infinity then 9X is equal to 8.99999999999999999999999999999999999991 where 9 is repeating to one less than infinity And because 9X = 8.99991 in this case, X = 0.99999 not 1. So X is the same value as it was before, it didnt even change. Prove me wrong, I'd like to see what you come up with. Unless you guys were just messing with people, I guess you dont have to prove me wrong. But then again, if you didnt get what I said (explained) then you probably will not agree with my proof. But it is 100% CORRECTYou make a fundamental mistake. 0.999... has an infinite number of decimals. That is not the same as "a lot" or "very, very many", but an -infinite- amount of decimals. And mathematically speaking, infinity - 1 = infinity. Therefore his proof is indeed correct, and it is one of many, many proofs that 0.999... = 1. Here are a few of them: The Algebraic Proofc = 0.999... 10c = 9.999... 10c - c = 9.999... - 0.999... 9c = 9 0.999... = 1 The Fraction Proof1/3 = 0.333... 3 x 0.333... = 3 x 1/3 = (3 x 1)/3 0.999... = 1 Proof using infinite seriesA decimal progression can be defined as a sum of infinite series, as follows: b0.b1b2b3... = b0 + b1(1/10) + b2(1/10)^2 + b3(1/10)^3... For an infinite progression you simply use the convergence theorem concerning infinite geometric series: If |r|<1 the ar + ar^2 + ar^3 + ... = ar/(1-r) 0.999... is such a sum, with the common ratio 1/10, which makes: 0.999... = 9(1/10) + 9(1/10)^2 + 9(1/10)^3 + ... = 9(1/10)/(1-1/10) = 1. More proofs that 0.999... = 1 can be found in any mathematical textbook, but I leave those up to you. Look up Cauchy sequences is you want to. A logical deduction that doesn't use any kind of algebra can also easily be made. If 0.999... has an infinite amount of decimals, it must be so close to 1 that there is no number small enough to "fill the gap" between 0.999... and 1 - because for such a number to exist, the 0.999... sequence must have a finite amount of decimals. Therefore 0.999... = 1.
Ive already seen this equation and studied them. But it is still wrong to say infinity minus the largest number in the whole entire world people could come up with is still infinity. Infinity needs to have a limit thus infinity minus the largest number in the whole entire world people could come up with should still be infinity minus the largest number in the whole entire world people could come up with instead of equaling it to infinity.
The only thing is.... there is a very minute and i mean minute difference in having 9X = 9 rather than 8.999999 (repeating to infinity followed by 1)1, that you cant even see the difference.
like say...........
X = 0.111111111 repeating to infinity (not equal to 1/9) because there is always a number after the 1 when its 1/9.
10X = 1.11111111 repeating to infinity minus 1
10X - X = 1.111111111 (repeating to infinity minus 1) - 0.1111111111 (repeating to infinity)
9X = 0.99999999999999999 repeating to infinity
X = 0.111111111111111 repeating to infinity which is still the same as the regular X as it was before.
1/9 however is a fraction, your calculator will give you and tell you that its 0.11111111111 repeating to infinity but its not............ its 0.11111111111 repeating to infinity minus one followed by c which is another constant number we do not know, well, at least i dont know.
so 1/9 times 9 is 1 not 0.999999999999999999999 repeating to infinity that only works if its 0.111111 repeating to infinity is multiplied by 9 then you get 0.999999999 repeating to infinity.
Many people confuses this concept even great mathematicians and they just believe it but I surely dont. It's like saying in physics................ the closer you travel to the speed of light, the longer you live. Well thats not really the exact words but its suppose to be the closer you travel to the speed of light, time will travel slower.
So say when I travel at the speed of light from earth to another galaxy far far away, and say it only took me 4 hours on my watch that I was wearing, and came back to earth right away giving a total of 8 hours at the speed of light, they say that the people in earth is gonna be about years older than they were the last time I saw them. Im like WTF? You cant slow time down, you can however, increase your speed in order to reduce time but not slow it down that it would actually affect everyone else other than you.
Yet again, this is just a theory someone made, I think Ienstien (dont know how to spell his name) or something. Yet has it been proven true?
Anyway, dont know what to say after all that space time thingy crap. But ye. Ima get somethng to eat and read about that Cauchy sequences thingy. See if that will prove me wrong.
Edit: the thing I talked about....... where 1/9 is not equal to 0.1111111111 repeating to infinity its actually 0.111111111111 (repeating to infinity minus one followed by a constant c)......
C is the remainder of that. Here's how it works......
You can never get a real number from the fraction 1/9, you will get a complex or something so.....
Lets do this in old school way.....
1 divided by 9, you cannot do it so you get 0 thus the first 0 in 0.111111
Now, you add a zero, giving you ten....... 10 divided by 9 is 1 thus you get the next one from 0.11111111111
Now, your remainder is 1 add another zero and it goes never ending
So the answer will eventually be 0.11111111 (repeating to infinity minus 1) followed by another constant and still i dont know what it is in this case because it just keeps going and going and going. Like Pi, it keeps going and going and going.
Edit: well I guess the value for C is one then....... correct me if im wrong, but thats my guess since its the only number we keep getting.
Or not because the remainder is 1 not quite sure, but c and the remainder can be be equal but not always.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
EliteHealer
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:50 am |
|
| Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 116 Location:
|
pinoyplaya wrote: Infinity needs to have a limit
For crying out loud, mathematics is not about opinions, it's about facts! Go read a mathematical textbook, please! The definition of infinity is THAT IT HAS NO LIMIT! That is the very definition of infinity. Until you understand that, you can't understand that 0.999... = 1.
_________________ IGN: MsAssassin
Lvl: 3x
Build: on my way to an 83% INT hybrid
IGN: Sophia777 (on vacation)
Lvl: 2x
Build: healer
STR/Force/Fire/Lightning/Blade
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pinoyplaya
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:03 am |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 595 Location:
|
EliteHealer wrote: pinoyplaya wrote: Infinity needs to have a limit For crying out loud, mathematics is not about opinions, it's about facts! Go read a mathematical textbook, please! The definition of infinity is THAT IT HAS NO LIMIT! That is the very definition of infinity. Until you understand that, you can't understand that 0.999... = 1.
Um....... ok so tell me, what is infinity minus the the largest number/amount in the whole entire world?
So say..... infinity minus that number equals infinity? So then, whats infinity divided by infinity?
Let me ask that again..... whats infinity divided by infinity? Im gonna wait for your answer and then see what you come up with.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Temptation
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:06 am |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 657 Location: California
|
|
lol@math nerds proving something that doesn't translate into real life. Or SRO even.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pinoyplaya
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:43 am |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 595 Location:
|
Temptation wrote: lol@math nerds proving something that doesn't translate into real life. Or SRO even.
LOL, this game wouldnt even exist without math.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Bakemaster
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:53 am |
|
| Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 4732 Location:
|
EliteHealer wrote: pinoyplaya wrote: Infinity needs to have a limit For crying out loud, mathematics is not about opinions, it's about facts! Go read a mathematical textbook, please! The definition of infinity is THAT IT HAS NO LIMIT! That is the very definition of infinity. Until you understand that, you can't understand that 0.999... = 1.
It's not that simple. There's countable infinity and there's uncountable infinity. There are concepts like cardinality and ordinal numbers in set theory that go waaaay beyond all these silly little algebraic proofs that are hip with the honors math kids in high school.
_________________ LOL
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Deacon
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:19 am |
|
| Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2006 Posts: 4377 Location: De Dutch
|
Panties wrote: thanks jerks, i got a headache now lol 
+1 
_________________ I cannot sing the blues...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
KutsarA
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:37 am |
|
| Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 241 Location:
|
its not calculus... its algebra  (one variable algebra i think????) =S
LOL
but i agree with plus... let's just wait and see....
edit:
prove that sin x = 6n. hahaha
_________________ Guild Overdrive
Pure Str Fire Blader
Level: 80 at exactly 11 months old ^_^
WAS LEGIT, IS LEGIT, WILL STAY LEGIT
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Deacon
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:40 am |
|
| Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2006 Posts: 4377 Location: De Dutch
|
|
Oke, and what is now the answer? The outcome.. ?:P
_________________ I cannot sing the blues...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Telankesy
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:03 am |
|
| Hi, I'm New Here |
 |
Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 7
|
pinoyplaya wrote: Um....... ok so tell me, what is infinity minus the the largest number/amount in the whole entire world?
So say..... infinity minus that number equals infinity? So then, whats infinity divided by infinity?
Let me ask that again..... whats infinity divided by infinity? Im gonna wait for your answer and then see what you come up with.
Hey pinoy I see you got a calculus book behind that so called proof of yours, why don't you read up on limits and convergences, then come back to this debate with a little more insight... not trying to be mean or anything but your argument there sounds like something out of a 12 years old. Ohhhh, why not the whole entire universe......
Infinity is more of a concept than a quantity, infinity is ever growing, so if you add in or take away a constant amount from something that’s ever growing, it’ll still be ever growing.
And to answer your question on what is infinity/infinity, well it’s indeterminate, since infinity is not a physical quantity, but we can approximate it by using l’Hopital’s rule with 2 functions that approaches infinity, again going back to limits and convergences. Btw l’Hopital’s rule is a fundamental concept which should also be covered in that calculus book of yours, or you can look it up on the net.
Also it's 2 different concepts we're talking about here, 0.999999 = 1 is convergence, infinity is something else.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Innovacious
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:24 am |
|
| Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 2446 Location:
|
I dont get what all this arguing is about, this
Quote: (1.02^(THELEVEL - 1))*((THELEVEL - 1)*4+20)*10)
Is correct, ive tested it, it works. Why is everyone arguing over it?
i tested it using http://bobtheveg.dyndns.org/SRO/Char_Build_Applet/ which i know is correct because i used it from almost lvl 1 up to lvl 52 with my current char and its been correct all the way
_________________

|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
KutsarA
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:47 am |
|
| Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 241 Location:
|
|
the game is only 0s and 1s.... how can it have infinity? lol
sorry im no math wiz.... but what is really the point of arguing over this infinity thing ??
tell me... for ordinary people like me.... am i able to use that infinity concept/calculus in real life? i mean... i think all i need is the ability to add/subtract/multiple/divide MONEY LOL
one can't have infinity amounts of money..................................
_________________ Guild Overdrive
Pure Str Fire Blader
Level: 80 at exactly 11 months old ^_^
WAS LEGIT, IS LEGIT, WILL STAY LEGIT
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
EliteHealer
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:26 pm |
|
| Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 116 Location:
|
Bakemaster wrote: EliteHealer wrote: pinoyplaya wrote: Infinity needs to have a limit For crying out loud, mathematics is not about opinions, it's about facts! Go read a mathematical textbook, please! The definition of infinity is THAT IT HAS NO LIMIT! That is the very definition of infinity. Until you understand that, you can't understand that 0.999... = 1. It's not that simple. There's countable infinity and there's uncountable infinity. There are concepts like cardinality and ordinal numbers in set theory that go waaaay beyond all these silly little algebraic proofs that are hip with the honors math kids in high school.
True, but these proofs have been used in mathematical textbooks at least since the early 19th century; proofs have been published by mathematicians like Midy, Leavitt, Fred Richman and even old Euler himself.
This works not only in our base 10 system, of course, but in any base. For example, in base 3, the ternary numeral system, 0.222... = 1, and this is a key point in constructing a Cantor set - and there is your cardinality for you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor_set
_________________ IGN: MsAssassin
Lvl: 3x
Build: on my way to an 83% INT hybrid
IGN: Sophia777 (on vacation)
Lvl: 2x
Build: healer
STR/Force/Fire/Lightning/Blade
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
PR0METHEUS
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:19 pm |
|
| Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 4093 Location: Earth
|
EliteHealer wrote: A logical deduction that doesn't use any kind of algebra can also easily be made. If 0.999... has an infinite amount of decimals, it must be so close to 1 that there is no number small enough to "fill the gap" between 0.999... and 1 - because for such a number to exist, the 0.999... sequence must have a finite amount of decimals. Therefore 0.999... = 1.
There's an error in your reasoning. You state that if 0.99999.... "has an infinite amount of decimals, it must be so close to 1 that there is no number small enough to 'fill the gap'". That just means that 0.99999999999 is the largest number in existance that is smaller than 1, but it is still smaller than 1. 0.99999999 is not equal to 1, it is smaller than 1.
Similarly, 0.3333333... does not really equal 1/3 because 1/3 is a real, finite number. 0.3333333.... goes on forever. The more 3's you add to the decimals, the larger the whole number gets. 0.3333333.... (and 0.9999999...) are infinitely growing, whereas 1 and also 1/3 are not growing.
_________________ Missing the good times in SRO... 
SRO: 1x, STR Blader (Thebes) 54, STR blader (Venice) 0x, INT wizard (Venice) 19, INT spear (Venice) 34, STR rogue/bard (Venus) 0x, STR blader (Venus) 8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Bakemaster
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:08 pm |
|
| Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 4732 Location:
|
EliteHealer wrote: True, but these proofs have been used in mathematical textbooks at least since the early 19th century; proofs have been published by mathematicians like Midy, Leavitt, Fred Richman and even old Euler himself. This works not only in our base 10 system, of course, but in any base. For example, in base 3, the ternary numeral system, 0.222... = 1, and this is a key point in constructing a Cantor set - and there is your cardinality for you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor_set
Yes, but what I'm saying is that the proofs aren't *true*, strictly speaking. They do not prove that two unequal numbers are equal. They point to the need for more advanced mathematics.
_________________ LOL
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Luoma
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:38 pm |
|
| Banned User |
 |
Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 3895 Location: Artists Corner & Aege
|
|
if i was a mod i'd lock this thread due to headache developing.
_________________ <<banned from SRF for proof of botting. -SG>>
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
PsYch008
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:47 pm |
|
| Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 4451 Location: reno
|
|
omg thanks for posting a large pic of garbage, and this thread is so stupid, please get rid of it. unnecessary server space being taken up.
_________________
 a work in progress...http://soundcloud.com/crowetic/trials
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pinoyplaya
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:17 am |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 595 Location:
|
Bakemaster wrote: EliteHealer wrote: True, but these proofs have been used in mathematical textbooks at least since the early 19th century; proofs have been published by mathematicians like Midy, Leavitt, Fred Richman and even old Euler himself. This works not only in our base 10 system, of course, but in any base. For example, in base 3, the ternary numeral system, 0.222... = 1, and this is a key point in constructing a Cantor set - and there is your cardinality for you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor_setYes, but what I'm saying is that the proofs aren't *true*, strictly speaking. They do not prove that two unequal numbers are equal. They point to the need for more advanced mathematics.
This is what ive been trying to say but just couldnt come up how to explain it without showing work. But i believe i did mention that 1/9 is not equal to .111 repeating but its just an approximation.
Thats why that equation.....
X = 0.99999 repeating
10X = 9.9999 repeating
10X - X = 9.999 repeating minus 0.999 repeating
9X = 9
X = 1
...... does not work right as X should continue to maintain its value. There is no variable in the world that can have two different values of its absolute values (I said absolute value because in functions such as X^2, you get a negative and a positive value for X).
So, that other proof 1/3 = 0.3333 repeating is not true but can be true in some ways as it is how we have been taught. But 1/3 is approximately 0.3333 repeating not equals but rather "approximate"
The reason why the topic came from that mathematical equation to something infinity was because I wanted to show a proof and the only way to understand it is if you but a limit to how many times the number is repeating otherwise, you will never get the correct answer because you just cant solve it as the number is repeating to infinity. And because we cannot add, subtract, divide, or do anything with infinity as it has no real value but just a concept, that algebraic proof can never be proven wrong or right in a way. Pfft, I cant explain anything today
But ye, this topic should now be closed and bring to an end, till next time.  Im suprised mods havent locked this thread yet.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
social
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:18 am |
|
| Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 345 Location:
|
|
nobody would play till 150 i think.. even with bot levelup at like lvl 120+ would take A LONG time...
_________________ VENICE DonMaf :: LVL 58 :: Pure STR 2h sword JackTerreur :: LVL 74 :: Pure STR blader
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
[TheJanitor]
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:30 am |
|
| Casual Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 76
|
|
I'd say it's about 32.33 repeating, of course, percentage of survival.
_________________
_TheJanitor_ / Sparta / 2X / [scourage]
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Silver
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:34 am |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2006 Posts: 924 Location:
|
|
um.. i guess this topic is fun to read when you're REALLY, REALLY bored.
+1 at the headache.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|