Silkroad Online Forums

I'm a hybrid int nuker right now. I forgot if I was 1:8 or 1:9 for 90 cap, but I put in str for 10 levels. My current goal is 90 spear/light/cold and 30 fire. I'm wondering if I should keep that goal or go 90 spear/light 60/fire/cold.

IMO go 90 ice light heuksal

Stay with 90light/90ice

What level of snow sheild should I leave it at? 40%?

I would keep leveling it. But thats my opinion :p

ur 9 int 1 str .. in my opinion go for 50 %

No he's 8:1...80 lvls of str/10 lvls of int = 90 lvls total? That's not hybrid enough to get 60 ice/light IMO so keep them maxed and get 30 fire for immunity to atleast ice =]

I'm not sure about spear, but a 1:8 hybrid int s/s actually can survive under 40% snow shield. As he is a spear, he'd probably do better with what you said, 90heuksal/90lightning/90cold, though I think that maybe 90heuksal/90fire/60cold/60lightning would be enough and even better in some points. Anyways, I don't really suggest any 90/90/60/60 build right now, bearing in mind that 100 cap is probably close and that you'd almost certainly have to do some real deleveling and have to re-think your whole build.


I'd say you should keep with 90heuksal/90cold/90lightning, but it's utterly up to you.


With 90 cold, max snow shield. And wear garment when at cap/high levels.

This vid has 100 spear, 99 light, 90 cold, and 11 fire. It seems like a REALLY good pvp build but, I don't know what kind of hybrid this person is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbOGMElSvRQ&fmt=18

I would lean on this remedy:
90 spear/light/cold 30 fire when skill cap is 90
90 spear/light 60 cold/fire when skill cap is 70 and no snow shield (as in ecsro)

I just msged the creator of that video and this is what he told me.

i think the other vid show her states with blues i think:73%phy /93%mag

what's with that genie?

OT:
seemed to do well. tanked pretty well.

wow the new flying dragon is really strong

I would go with the 30 fire build. You need snow shield and the lightnin buff which boosts your magical damage.

off: he's great. i did the same thing, he must be thinking that occidentals are a pain in the ass right now ^^

on; i'd put more than 10lvls of str and go spear/light/cold, but this is just my opinion.

Should I put any more points into str?

That genie was that thief's attack pet. Like a wolf or crow =]

I like the song, great vid ^_^

this is why I think
light>fire.

Hm... with the 100 cap coming up, I might change my build. Do you guys think it'll be any good compared to my current build?

Anyone?

@dopes
What exactly is your current build? What build do you want to change to? Same as when you started the topic?

I currently have 10 levels of str right now and I'm wondering if I should follow the same build as AngelDust (25 levels of str). From his videos, it looks like it dominates in pvp.

First of all, no build dominates on PvP. 'l337 player skillz' with good equipment dominate PvP. Secondly, knowing that extra str willincrease your survivability, but at that cost it will also decrease your damage as you'd have less int, it's completely up to you if you want it or not. STR = survivability; INT = damage. Generally, more survivability means better PvPing, the only thing that counters this last idea is the snow shield, which makes INTs tank as much or more than a STR for 2 mins. As a side note, in the videos he was frequently under snow shield and buffed by euros.

Which do you think will be better off @ 100 cap? Should I put 5-10 more levels of str, or keep my current build.

Again: no build is 'better' and,

Make your choice based on what you like.

Well I don't think I'll be doing much pvp unless I'm bored, so staying with my current build is better?

For the third time, do whatever you please. If you really enjoy it, you'll know how to use it, and probably eventually be strong. More STR = survivability; More INT = damage. If you like your build how it is, with 10 lvls of STR, I don't really see a point in changing it. Unless YOU feel like you lack survivability, and would like to exchange some damage for improved survivability.