Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 666 Location: Davey Jones' Locker
.Ex wrote:
I for one don't exactly think that clothes always reflect the persons intentions (sexual in this case).
I've met plenty of girls at parties that barely wear anything but you just know they aren't DTF (sowwie for the jshore language). A lot of girls just like a little bit of attention, and I think that's only natural.
This. Also if you're just a product that's shaped by the materialistic media such as today's pop-culture then you deserve every bad thing you get.
_________________ No matter how much you think you love somebody, you'll step back when the pool of their blood edges up too close.
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Age of Wushu
There's a scientific study shows that women with big boobs and ass have more female hormone that others and tend to cheat on the partner. Count the number of girls who sleep with other boys while she has a boyfriend is uncountable
I for one don't exactly think that clothes always reflect the persons intentions (sexual in this case).
I've met plenty of girls at parties that barely wear anything but you just know they aren't DTF (sowwie for the jshore language). A lot of girls just like a little bit of attention, and I think that's only natural.
you can get attention and still not look like a slut. guys dont think OMFG SHE HAS HUGE TITS THEREFORE SHE MUST BE A COOL OUTGOING FUN GIRL THAT I WANNA DATE!
if you want to be noticed... try standing out. that means, wearing clothes that make you look sexy without giving me a full view of your tits... or dye your hair... or have a crazy talent (i can teach you how to solve a rubiks cube if you want =) )
Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 5168 Location: Palmdale, CA
penfold1992 wrote:
you can get attention and still not look like a slut. guys dont think OMFG SHE HAS HUGE TITS THEREFORE SHE MUST BE A COOL OUTGOING FUN GIRL THAT I WANNA DATE!
No, guys think:
Omfg she has huge tits and she's dtf. The cool, outgoing, fun girls that you want to date are the ones who don't need to dress like a slut in order to get attention.
Personally, I prefer a girl who is comfortable walking around the house in sweats, her hair in a bun, and just comfortable. That's when a girl looks the best.
_________________ Speak the truth, even if your voice shakes.
Sexual activity at 11? Holy hell, I don't think I let anyone near my penis until I was at least 18, if not older. I didn't even know that had sexual education at such a young age, people are crazy.
you can get attention and still not look like a slut. guys dont think OMFG SHE HAS HUGE TITS THEREFORE SHE MUST BE A COOL OUTGOING FUN GIRL THAT I WANNA DATE!
No, guys think:
Omfg she has huge tits and she's dtf. The cool, outgoing, fun girls that you want to date are the ones who don't need to dress like a slut in order to get attention.
Personally, I prefer a girl who is comfortable walking around the house in sweats, her hair in a bun, and just comfortable. That's when a girl looks the best.
exactly, the ones that catch your attention is the cool fun girls who dont dress slutty to get attention... and i agree thats when they look their best!
i hate the type of guys that will go to a club and fk a girl based on their looks at the end of the night, it just gives the impression that girls are objects rather then human beings.
when i go to the local mall, i barely see a women working at a shop that doesnt have make up on that you can CLEARLY see and its disgusting! like, so much foundation you can see the powder caked up on their skin.... or using so much concieler that you can easily identify where the spots are by the density of the products.
or eyelashes that are so glued together they look like they just came from a bukka.... u get my point.
i hate the type of guys that will go to a club and fk a girl based on their looks at the end of the night, it just gives the impression that girls are objects rather then human beings.
Words with no substance. Why would you hate them? Is it a sin for a guy to be attracted to a girl because of her looks?
How young are you talking here? 14+, thats normal. 10+, blame Disney
read my OP... 90% of children have watched porn or took part in a sexual activity by the age of 11
i know that our bodies are made to have sex in our teens but because of some vital issues about sex "underage pregnancy but mainly STD's" i think that kids should be removed from the media and pop videos that blatently provoke sex.
another example... when Rhianna was warned about themes that could influence children in her video to the song "Man down" she replied saying that it was important for young women to think about their actions and that it (rape) could happen to anyone of us (referring to young women)
rhianna's next single? S&M IRONY!
oh and
_Equal_ wrote:
I stayed a virgin till I was 19.
i lol'd everyone here knows u aint had no sex bro =)
I really dont think people are having sexual activity by 11, unless they are including kissing or something. 13, i'd understand even. And everyone starts watching porn by 10, whats the big deal.
_________________ let it gooooo let it gooooOoOooOOOOOO
Let her suck my pistol She open up her mouth and then I blow her brains out
Could you point to the research conducted? So far, you've provided statistics with no citations and an inexplicable link to shirts of poor taste, so the topic is really only being discussed around your hearsay and nothing more.
I don't know what it is about these topics that turn people into prudish women, clutching their pearls in shock while speaking through some pretense of nobleness. It feels like quite the disconnect to be discussing how prim and proper females and future offspring should dress when it's most likely that participants will later be relieving themselves to images of women posing naked in submissive positions. But I digress.
The entertainment industry is, cleverly enough, made up of entertainers not babysitters, and it really irks me when parents throw a morally outraged hissy fit when the world isn't conforming to the needs of their spawn. It is not an entertainer's responsibility to teach anyone anything. Parents who are unable or unwilling to teach their children critical thinking and using their judgement are usually always the first to pass the buck as to who is to blame for their child's stupidity.
I'm not sure why anyone feels women should dress to please anyone but themselves, as this discussion keeps implying. How little or how much women wear is entirely their choice and to sit here and pass judgement seems incredibly denigrating. Is it possible that women's fashion sense has been more sexualized? Of course. Does it matter? Not at all. If you're so brazen as to judge someone based only on their attire, then it's a mystery to me how you could possibly imagine them enjoying your shallow companionship.
Pinoy_Archer wrote:
Ain't no fun if we be all Amish right?
Just wait till rumspringa at 16 and make a beeline for the door.
.Ex wrote:
Words with no substance. Why would you hate them? Is it a sin for a guy to be attracted to a girl because of her looks?
If anything, hate the girl for being that easy.
It should be irrelevant whether or not the female is inviting for intimacy because the responsibility of taking or refusing that offer lies squarely on the shoulders of the partner. This is like blaming rape victims for dressing too suggestively– the "She was asking for it" defense.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
