Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4599 Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
Maxed out, cold buff + passive gives an extra 97 physical defence. Archers usually invest in cold (there are alot of cold based archers) but it's not necessary. i believe fire archers are better. I think you should level COLD for the novas and buff + passive. To be really effective heuksal passive needs to be maxed out. As heuksal is NOT the tree for archers, the heuksal passive is a pretty bad idea.
but don't srowd nukers also have the heuskal passive maxed out i was thinking that archers were kinda the same except damage wise that they out any class but there nukes takes time to cast likes archers attacks so the extra hp help to tank
Well, of course, extra HP is always nice. ut as a full Str archer, ou can tank ALOT more than a nuker. Therefor I think extra defense would be more wise to invest in.
_________________ Level: 67
Build: Heavy Int Hybrid, Fire/Lightning/Heuksal
Server: Troy
Guild: DareDevils * The_Only_One
yes ur rite bout the defense but glavie and spear users have stuns(not to mention very high attaks plus passive) srowd and blade users have extra defense by sheild KD and stab archers have high criticals but no attacks that the other class have but its defence over hp which is better?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum