Post subject: Are the passive skills really worth it?
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:09 pm
New Member
Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 43
I was looking at a skill tree for fire, ice, and lightning. It seems like the passives offer such small benefits. For examply, according to the skill tree I viewed, the fire passive increases physical damage by 1% at first, then up to 6% by level 60. In any case, is this really worth investing skill points into?...or is there something I am missing? (Same question for the other passives as well)
XD, pacheon passive is probably useless if u dont go all the way
& yes, other than that passives are good only if u go all the way, maxed ice passive is 44 or so phy.def + 55 or so phy.def buff & u get almost 100 extra phy.def, 6% fire passive + 7% phy.attk buff =13% ^^, 27 parry passive + 29 parry buff = 56 more parry to recieve least dmg possible most of the time,
so passives are good, but only if u go all the way
however; i would like to say bicheon's block is messed up, i would use the maxed 2nd book shield technique of 32%, have 7% passive, & like a 16 or so BR shield = 55% BR or so & yet i dont block 1/4 of attks, but then again i guess my opponent must have maxed BR on their weapon
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum