Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 3rd book of FIRE NUKE
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:50 am 
Casual Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 92
Location: Hone
i heard that 3rd book of fire nuke is weaker then the 2nd. Is that true? and Should i continue +point to the concentration in lighting?

_________________
Image


SERVER = ELDERADO
BUILD = HYBRID S/S
LV = 80
WEAPON = SOSUN SWORD 64+7 61% mag att


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:21 am 
Common Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 183
Location:
Sparta
Yes to both

Third nuke has longer cooldown, lower damage, but more simultaneous attack

_________________
One day...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:47 pm 
Frequent Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1387
Location:
Olympus
zephyr wrote:
Yes to both

Third nuke has longer cooldown, lower damage, but more simultaneous attack


yup exactly what u said :)
2nd nuke has higher dmg maxed and less cool down time

_________________
Guilds : CRAZY_FOOS
http://www.youtube.com/user/theonlyfoo
http://theonlyfoo.deviantart.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:19 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4599
Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
3'rd fire + 2'nd ice + 2'nd light nuke: Lots of mobs dead. However, 3'rd fire is not worth maxing. Level 1 of it only. :)

_________________
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:18 pm 
Regular Member
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 261
Location:
Persia
Should max 3rd book fire nuke. Dont bother getting ice nukes, they are weak. Later on you will most likely finding yourself needing 3 nukes, book 2 and 3 fire and book 2 lightning.

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 1:09 pm 
Valued Member
Offline

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 404
Elemental wrote:
Should max 3rd book fire nuke. Dont bother getting ice nukes, they are weak. Later on you will most likely finding yourself needing 3 nukes, book 2 and 3 fire and book 2 lightning.


I agree. 2nd book fire nuke is for just want to do lots of dmg on 1 person.

2nd book light / 3rd book fire is for killin lots...
like in pve to kill faster. also good for group job wars when the glavie and blader all go in a bunch and u do the 3rd book fire and hope to kill 1

Ice nuke is just weak i wouldnt bother gettin it if u do pvp mainly. Only thing ice nuke 2nd book is good for is uniques, freezing em

_________________
Sever: Oasis
IGN: IMPORKCHOP
Level: 80
Build: Pure Int Spear
Guild: HKs/SKs
*QUITED SRO*
now playing
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:41 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 787
Location: The netherlands
uniques can't be frozen >.>

_________________
Quote:
Shave a single hair....really? Just yank that pubic hair shit off your face.
Your mom made it sound like a phuckin bean stock is gonna start growing off your face and seek vengeance for cutting it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:28 pm 
New Member
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 41
Location: hoi
2 fire nuke is maxed stronger
But 3 nuke looks much cooler


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group