server cap at 3500 is bad idea

XMoshe · **Posted:** Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:04 pm

CuteCloud wrote:

Thats odd, before i used to have lag.
Terrible lag, and now everything works pefect, and its a lot easier to get into the game now that they raised the cap. Doesnt take 200 tries anylonger.

And for the people saying its always your computer or internet that its wrong with, you couldnt be more wrong.

Damn you...it farked up my shit.....

@heroo, I never complained about JM

Progress · **Joined:** Jun 2006 **Posts:** 304 **Location:** Earth

Airbeat wrote:

Omfg..
ITS NOT THE SERVERS, Its your crappy internet or PC !!
How else can i play without lag ? STOP complaining -_-"
Buy a new pc / internet if it bothers you so freakin much ..

Lets say that i have a 0.5-1 sec lag before they raised the cap to 3500. And now with the cap at 3500, i get 5-10 sec long lag spikes. Would your logical conclusion of the problem be that it is your computer and/or your internet (both being unchanged), that are causing the problems?

You really need to learn basic problem solving skills and the difference between network lag and low FPS.

If you feel that people's complaints bother you, feel free to get the **** out of this thread and/or shut the **** up.

fethrin · **Joined:** Apr 2007 **Posts:** 378 **Location:**

being able to login in under 10 tries>lag or d/c

XMoshe · **Posted:** Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:52 pm

fethrin wrote:

being able to login in under 10 tries>lag or d/c

Whats the point in logging in fast when you cant play due to lag...

Sharp324 · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 4383 **Location:**

Some of you guys bitch at everything they do...get over it.

HertogJan · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 1063 **Location:**

I never bitch about anything, just this lag is the first thing that annoys me. Cant even grind decent and talk in guildchat.

Burningwolf · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 2583 **Location:** :|

ehhhh
im used to the lag

and i

easier logins ^.^

moon.ninja · **Joined:** Nov 2007 **Posts:** 132 **Location:**

its been the same for me in terms of lag and so on ..

but it really is easier to sign on for me. 5tries MAX now. Its actually populated for me in the mornings sometimes.

only thing im worried about is gold companies starting to create MORE gold bots, then that'll be worst.

OwnedByFudge · **Joined:** Dec 2007 **Posts:** 390

U guys complain about loggin in.. they make more space.... u still complain, they cant win.

TOloseGT · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 7129 **Location:**

no, joymax has already won, srf just loses.

Casey613 · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:19 am

First you moan about JM making more servers instead of rising the servers capacity, and now this?

Geez, make up your minds...

BaronSengir · **Joined:** Apr 2007 **Posts:** 654 **Location:** Earth

lol i use to have NO LAG NO DC at all but now its so damn laggy and i keep getting dced
i have lost interest in logging in since i cant look forward to anything pve pvp alchemy stalling since they all result in dc

lilly_ · **Joined:** Jul 2007 **Posts:** 432 **Location:** ...

_SomeOne_ wrote:

1st u want JM to stop making new servers and start making more slots on servers...
now they have done that, u want then to put it back down to 3000?
i donno what is wrong with u ppl

+1

I complained bout the server traffic and why joymax is opening so many servers instead of increaser the server limit, i'm quite happy that they did it, i find it alot easier loggin in in the morning now.

Some people seriously complain too much, the world ain't perfect so don't expect to have everything the way you want it.

ScZz · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:18 pm

this has a bad side and a good side , the bad side is that this means more people on my grind spot and the good side means i can actually login at 4AM in the morning now lol

the map is just not meant to have more than 3-4k people. Raising server capacity is ridiculous (just like everything new joymax makes)

borat2 · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:44 pm

OwnedByFudge wrote:

U guys complain about loggin in.. they make more space.... u still complain, they cant win.

making more space does not solve the actual problem, they just making the problem even bigger, more goldbots, cheaper gold, more people who will buy gold and the circle starts again.
its a bit easier to log in but they simply should wipe out the goldbots from time to time

heroo · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 6618 **Location:**

borat2 wrote:

OwnedByFudge wrote:

U guys complain about loggin in.. they make more space.... u still complain, they cant win.

making more space does not solve the actual problem, they just making the problem even bigger, more goldbots, cheaper gold, more people who will buy gold and the circle starts again.
its a bit easier to log in but they simply should wipe out the goldbots from time to time

heroo wrote:

be realistic.

borat2 · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:03 pm

i still believe joymax one day will understand they got it all wrong :cry:

HakubiNi · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 843 **Location:**

Wonder how much more expensive would banning the gold bots be, for them to instead chose to upgrade their equipment to handle 500 more players/bots.

frankaslt1 · **Joined:** Jul 2007 **Posts:** 421 **Location:** leit

heroo wrote:

i really sometimes think you guys deserve to be treated like that by joymax.

you first almost cry becuz the servers are too crowded, and than joymax tries to solve this problem ( atleast i think ) and than you guys go cry about it wasn't a good idea.

wat you guys want? jeezzz, shut the **** up please.

be realistic.

LOL if jm would want to solve crowd servers problem they would protect game from clientless bots , if they bann all clientless gold bots server cap would increase by 1k lol.

MissLe2 · **Joined:** Oct 2007 **Posts:** 809 **Location:**

it would be better if JM would charge all bots a fee to bot
that would make them fewer and more opportunity for legits to play

also all should pay what a stupid idea
if you want to buy premium that is your choice
why should all have to pay to play

heroo · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 6618 **Location:**

frankaslt1 wrote:

heroo wrote:

i really sometimes think you guys deserve to be treated like that by joymax.

you first almost cry becuz the servers are too crowded, and than joymax tries to solve this problem ( atleast i think ) and than you guys go cry about it wasn't a good idea.

wat you guys want? jeezzz, shut the **** up please.

be realistic.

LOL if jm would want to solve crowd servers problem they would protect game from clientless bots , if they bann all clientless gold bots server cap would increase by 1k lol.

think global, act local! > guild

iGod · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 3728 **Location:**

2k cap = no lag, no dcs, barely any goldbots.. thats why new servers are great.

GodsAngel · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 467 **Location:**

borat2 wrote:

i still believe joymax one day will understand they got it all wrong :cry:

it's good to have big dreams, keep believing!
of course it'll never come true, gimme a fcking cookie now b1tch

SiWarrior · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 85 **Location:**

Sharp324 wrote:

Some of you guys bitch at everything they do...get over it.

^^
..it afree game

whitesnow · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 102 **Location:**

Mameluke wrote:

DC a lot, lag everywhere, hotan is a nightmare (pressing V doens't even help anymore), more ksing bots,...

Who else doesn't like 3500 cap?

I can offer a tiny bit of advice that might help, if even in the slightest. Go to your game options, the key settings, and check the box thats marked "Hide ability pets." Voila, all rabbits/monkeys/cats/etc are gone.

Imo, if you don't have something productive to say, just walk away. Complaining just for the sake of complaining isn't going to contribute to a forum.

DESOUL · **Joined:** Dec 2007 **Posts:** 175 **Location:**

Malicious wrote:

inxiLe wrote:

_SomeOne_ wrote:

1st u want JM to stop making new servers and start making more slots on servers...
now they have done that, u want then to put it back down to 3000?
i donno what is wrong with u ppl

With increasing the number of slots, we usually mean around 6ish, 7ish thousand slots. not 500. -_-

That would only mean the biggest lag ever. 500 is enough. I haven't found it any different for Sparta. Only difference is that now my friends without premium can actually log in at times.

That cracked me up, neptune is like the most crowded serv atm cause of its cap and i still manage to login at anytime without prem , your friends just aren't trying =\

skandal · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 174 **Location:**

Erm..it's kinda true..unfortunately, a 3.5k cap is a retarded idea....rasining the cap in general is retarded...everybody who ever went to jangan after the cap was raised would notice a ton of new "legits" called asdgash running back and forth...Even 7k cap wouldn't solve sh*t because then there would simply be more space for gold companies to login their bots...thank god some of us are faster than them

.Truth is there is nothing that can be done now.Except ban the freaking gold bots...that would free up alot of space on the servers(i guess like 2k slots at least

).Thei're the main cause why gold in SRO is at least 10 times cheaper than in any other mmorpg.

_SomeOne_ · **Joined:** Sep 2007 **Posts:** 735 **Location:**

skandal wrote:

Erm..it's kinda true..unfortunately, a 3.5k cap is a retarded idea....rasining the cap in general is retarded...everybody who ever went to jangan after the cap was raised would notice a ton of new "legits" called asdgash running back and forth...Even 7k cap wouldn't solve sh*t because then there would simply be more space for gold companies to login their bots...thank god some of us are faster than them

.Truth is there is nothing that can be done now.Except ban the freaking gold bots...that would free up alot of space on the servers(i guess like 2k slots at least

).Thei're the main cause why gold in SRO is at least 10 times cheaper than in any other mmorpg.

4 day old topic.. that was on like 2nd - 3rd page...

Silkroad Online Forums

server cap at 3500 is bad idea

Who is online