Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:25 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2018
Location:
Rome
Okay, so here's my question:

How do these big machines that are capable of creating great explosions of energy with temperatures reaching 100,000 times hotter than the sun able to do so without melting? haha it seems like a stupid question, but they routinely do this, and if something is that hot, it must melt shit around it! :shock:

_________________
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:03 pm 
Frequent Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1497
Location: Origin Online
It probably has something to do with how long they can sustain those temperatures. If it is a few nanoseconds, then cooling shouldn't be too big a deal(not to say it doesn't get really hot). It's kinda like how you can wave your hand through a fire really fast and not get burned.

_________________
Origin Online
EdgeworthScoundrels


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:08 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2018
Location:
Rome
I suppose..but, i mean, at temps 100,000x greater than the sun, it still seems weird to me haha

_________________
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:11 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4599
Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
Apart from the argument above... maybe the mass of the particles is so small, that the heat they generate simply disperses before it can make itself felt.

_________________
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:12 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2018
Location:
Rome
hmm, that can make some sense on some level...a lot of the time they are dealing with up and down quarks whose are esentially massless. Well, not really but, on these scales, they might as well be.

_________________
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:18 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4599
Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
E = mc2 ... when you have an essentially massless object, the energy doesn't get too big either, doesn't it? :)

Note that at my age of 15 I do not fully understand Einstein's formula. I can't figure out a physical, practical application. All I said above was because it sort of made sense to me that an object with small mass can't hold an awful lot of energy, and the formula appeared to contain a link between the two.

_________________
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:54 pm 
Advanced Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2293
Location:
Off Topic
i just learned about it in chem, a tokamak is used to heat up the tritium and hydrogen to 3,000,000k and fusion begins. can only sustain for like 5 seconds. it use strong magnetic field to contain the heat and it is HUGE

_________________
Image Image
thnx Kraq


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:13 pm 
Valued Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 456
Location:
Venus
Stress wrote:
Apart from the argument above... maybe the mass of the particles is so small, that the heat they generate simply disperses before it can make itself felt.


You get a (:::) for giving the correct answer!

_________________
Venus: Crush
Oasis: BuryMe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:53 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 854
Location:
Off Topic
yes as said before, it probably uses an extremely powerful magnetic field to keep the hot stuff from touching the machine

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:42 am 
Regular Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 328
Location:
Oasis
tritium=hydrogen

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:44 am 
Advanced Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2148
Location: 5 Mins Ahead
Portable Plasma Coffee Mug

_________________
If the concept of us being all one consciousness's and us being one thing that lives endless through the cycle of nature the only clear emotion would be understanding .
we be in a utopia
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:53 am 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5245
Location:
Off Topic
FireJammerXR wrote:
tritium=hydrogen

No. Its an isotope of hydrogen with 2 neutrons rather than 0.

_________________
Ooh, I got a sexy ex-staff title!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:57 am 
Active Member
Offline

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 666
Location:
Off Topic
the reason why the container aren't melting because there is generally no activity or very activity in there that doesn't generate heat that much. Unless when a trigger activates those activities (molecules bumbing into one another) that is when things get crazy.

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:16 am 
Senior Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4490
Location:
Pacific
Someone alert Doctor Octavius, his secret plan is getting out...

I believe it has to do with the mass of the object, if it was a few times larger, it could potentially self sustain itself (No, I'm not getting that from spiderman, I learnt alittle bit about it, but I don't like my science teacher, so I wasn't really paying attention)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:43 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Location:
Off Topic
how hot is 1.21 gigawatts of electricity??? thats what it takes to run my flux capacitor!!!
Image

_________________
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:51 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4599
Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
StealMySoda wrote:
FireJammerXR wrote:
tritium=hydrogen

No. Its an isotope of hydrogen with 2 neutrons rather than 0.


Yes. That's correct.

Deuterium = Isotope of hydrogen with 1 neutron rather than 0. D20 = Heavy Water, used with fission nuclear reactors.

Tritium = Isotope of hydrogen with 2 neutrons rather than 0. T20 = Super Heavy Water, probably used with future fusion nuclear reactors.


I hope I remembered my facts correctly :)

_________________
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:18 am 
Casual Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 84
Location:
Redsea
Particle accelerators are the devil and use dark magic to contain the highly explosive energies. It's all a government plot to keep us from developing a mega death ray that could destroy the commies. Just by mentioning the words particle accelerator you have been marked for death by a secret organization of ninja pirate demon monkeys.

_________________
Image
Thanks to Hershey for the freakin awesome sig!!!!

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:22 am 
Chronicle Writer
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9841
Location: US - Illidan
agent420 wrote:
how hot is 1.21 gigawatts of electricity??? thats what it takes to run my flux capacitor!!!
Image



ahhhh beat me to it....

_________________
Image Image
signatures by Hostage Co. <3
~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:55 pm 
Valued Member
Offline

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 359
JacksColon wrote:
Okay, so here's my question:

How do these big machines that are capable of creating great explosions of energy with temperatures reaching 100,000 times hotter than the sun able to do so without melting? haha it seems like a stupid question, but they routinely do this, and if something is that hot, it must melt shit around it! :shock:



I dont know nothing about them but with simple logic I can say they got some very good coolers :P yes they do reach those temps but the coolers maybe keep the surface enough cool to not melt... :roll: and maybe use graphite for the insides surface or some sort of this :O dunno


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:02 am 
Advanced Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2168
Location:
Troy
Basically the way these things work is:

They have a huge (many kilometers) circular construct where everything takes place. They use "beams" of particles such as protons that are accelerated to extremely high velocities reaching a huge amount of energy. Since protons have a charge, they can be steered using electric and magnetic fields. These have to be tuned very precisely in order to keep the beams from hitting the walls of the accelerator because at the energy levels required in the experiments they are conducting, if the beam were to become uncontrolled it would be catastrophic and damage the machine and delay further experiments for years.

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the particle accelerator that has been in the news lately. It's the one that's scheduled to come online in the next year or so. They have a couple of different points on the path of the accelerator that they have detectors for their experiments. The beams are sent around and around and at certain points, they are deliberately made to cross so that there is some collision of particles. Head on collisions aren't too frequent, but there are many glancing hits. The head on collisions are the ones that give very good data.

In chemistry class, you may have heard of the "Law of Conservation of Mass" where you could neither create nor destroy matter. However, in particle physics, it's more correctly the "Law of Conservation of Mass-Energy" where Einstein's famous, e=mc^2 equation is the bridge from mass to energy and vice versa. Essentially, they are hoping for some very very very very high energy collisions between protons that would have tons of energy which (if they're lucky) will create some new particles that have been theorized to exist such as the Higgs Boson. The LHC greatly surpasses the energy levels of previous accelerators and they are hoping this increase in energy results in some new findings.

My physics professor keeps going on about how "it's an exciting time for particle physics" and if they end up finding something new and cool, he's definitely right XD

_________________
I'm in your posts, stealing your quotes.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:54 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4599
Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
Thanks for the info, chuch :)

Good to know.

_________________
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A Question About Particle Accelerators
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:15 pm 
Casual Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 53
Location: Cabal EU
Yea, and I've heard some rumours from one Russian professor, that when particles collide at nearly the speed of light, a Time Hole can be created by accident, though for only a few ps (1*10^-15 seconds) or so, and you can travel in time :shock: (LOL, he is INSANE!!)

I wish I could see the Collide sometime... One should be launched a few weeks after this post in Geneva, heard it from my Physics teach.

_________________
Image
Cabal EU ~ SixthSense ~ Force Blader


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group